TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Container Apps

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AAzure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A

    Azure Functions

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AAzure Functions enables users to execute event-driven serverless code functions with an end-to-end development experience.

    $18

    per month approximately

    Pricing
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Editions & Modules
    vCPU (seconds)
    active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
    Memory (GiB-Seconds)
    active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Functions
    This is the most straightforward and easy-to-implement server less solution.
    App Service is great, but it's designed for websites, and it cannot scale automatically as easily as Azure Functions. Container Apps is a robust and scalable choice, but they need much more planning, …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Azure Container Apps and Azure Functions
    Feature
    Azure Container Apps
    5.3
    2 Ratings
    40% below category average
    Azure Functions
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces5.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability7.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform management overhead5.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability5.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform access control4.42 Ratings00 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration4.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation4.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification5.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes5.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Azure Container Apps and Azure Functions
    Feature
    Azure Container Apps
    -
    Ratings
    Azure Functions
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Azure Container Apps and Azure Functions
    Feature
    Azure Container Apps
    -
    Ratings
    Azure Functions
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Azure Container Apps and Azure Functions
    Feature
    Azure Container Apps
    -
    Ratings
    Azure Functions
    8.8
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score7.3 out of 10
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Container AppsAzure Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    They're great to embed logic and code in a medium-small, cloud-native application, but they can become quite limiting for complex, enterprise applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Gives user a level of autonomous access
    • No control plane or node pool to manage
    • Less kubernetes experience required
    • Easily integrate with Azure devops
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • They natively integrate with many triggers from other Azure services, like Blob Storage or Event Grid, which is super handy when creating cloud-native applications on Azure (data wrangling pipelines, business process automation, data ingestion for IoT, ...)
    • They natively support many common languages and frameworks, which makes them easily approachable by teams with a diverse background
    • They are cheap solutions for low-usage or "seasonal" applications that exhibits a recurring usage/non-usage pattern (batch processing, montly reports, ...)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Continue to enhance security
    • Better pricing
    • Flexibility
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • My biggest complaint is that they promote a development model that tightly couples the infrastructure with the app logic. This can be fine in many scenarios, but it can take some time to build the right abstractions if you want to decouple you application from this deployment model. This is true at least using .NET functions.
    • In some points, they "leak" their abstraction and - from what I understood - they're actually based on the App Service/Web App "WebJob SDK" infrastructure. This makes sense, since they also share some legacy behavior from their ancestor.
    • For larger projects, their mixing of logic, code and infrastructure can become difficult to manage. In these situations, good App Services or brand new Container Apps could be a better fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    This is the most straightforward and easy-to-implement server less solution. App Service is great, but it's designed for websites, and it cannot scale automatically as easily as Azure Functions. Container Apps is a robust and scalable choice, but they need much more planning, development and general work to implement. Container Instances are the same as Container Apps, but they are extremely more limited in termos of capacity. Kubernetes Service si the classic pod container on Azure, but it requires highly skilled professional, and there are not many scenario where it should be used, especially in smaller teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
    • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
    • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • They allowed me to create solutions with low TCO for the customer, which loves the result and the low price, that helped me create solutions for more clients in less time.
    • You can save up to 100% of your compute bill, if you stay under a certain tenant conditions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots