TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Blob Storage vs. Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Blob Storage

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Blob Storage system on Azure is designed to make unstructured data available to customers anywhere through REST-based object storage.

    $0.01

    per GB/per month

    Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AHitachi Content Platform (HCP) is a scalable object storage platform with enterprise-level security, for archiving, backup, and content/data sharing.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Editions & Modules
    Block Blobs
    $0.0081
    per GB/per month
    Azure Data Lake Storage
    $0.0081
    per GB/per month
    Files
    $0.058
    per GB/per month
    Managed Discs
    $1.54
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Hitachi Vantara
    Chose Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    [Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)] has all of the features of competitive offerings and wraps them in a better multi-tenancy solution. It's object level permission model and non-overridable immutability (in Compliance mode for configured namespaces) is a bump up compared to other …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Small Businesses
    Google Cloud Storage
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Azure Blob Storage
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure Data Lake Storage
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Azure Data Lake Storage
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud Storage
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Google Cloud Storage
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (9 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Blob StorageHitachi Content Platform (HCP)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Blob storage is well suited to hosting/sharing zipped files rather than several smaller files, as folder enumeration/listing is not supported. Files uploaded are case-sensitive, so users need to be educated on the correct naming convention format if they are delegating the file-sharing process outside of IT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    • [Hitachi Content Platform (HCP) is] well suited for needs requiring a highly secure, multi-tenant on-premise object store.
    • Exceeds expectations with respect to object level attributes and permissions
    • Has excellent S3/HS3 REST API feature set
    • Situations which require versioning and proven Immutability (certified by Governments)
    - Expensive to use for general file storage publishing where meta data, compliance, retention, versioning are unnecessary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Easy to work with - drag and drop
    • Capable of long term retention
    • Relatively low cost
    • Good for different data formats
    • Allows archival storage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    • HCP/HDI interface works like charm. it's easy to deploy and scale.
    • Hitachi customer support is at par with expectations
    • More cost effective than EMC/NetApp solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • If we are transferring huge amount of data (outbound), it can get quite expensive.
    • With new features being added constantly, although a good thing, at times it becomes difficult to keep up with the changes. Documentation needs to keep UpToDate and should include best practices.
    • Performance can be improved especially when it comes to cold storage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    • Cost structure is by capacity and is expensive
    • Some access settings are mutually exclusive for performance (REST vs. CIFS)
    • QoS by Tenant requires use of external ADC (Hitachi suggested and sold us Pulse Secure) and their support on this product offering is not up to their normally high standard
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Blob storage is fairly simple, with several different options/settings that can be configured. The file explorer has enhanced its usability. Some areas could be improved, such as providing more details or stats on how many times a file has been accessed. It is an obvious choice if you're already using Azure/Entra.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Microsoft has improved its customer service standpoint over the years. The ability to chat with an issue, get a callback, schedule a call or work with an architecture team(for free) is a huge plus. I can get mentorship and guidance on where to go with my environment without pushy sales tactics. This is very refreshing. Typically support can get me to where I need to be on the first contact, which is also nice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Azure Blob Storage is the best choice to store files when the app runs in Azure. It also has some advantages over S3, like Shared Access Signatures, that make it easy to control access to files directly via a URL. Azure Blob Storage is very fast and we have not had any major issues with it after using it for several years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    My company has close ties with Hitachi. NetApp chargeback was more per Gig and for cost saving purposes, we had to choose HCP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Azure has increased the flexibility of where we place data within our organization.
    • It has proven to be very reliable and always accessible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hitachi Vantara
    • Best on premise solution of its' kind that encapsulates all our needs
    • ROI has been positive but it does raise questions at renewal time in terms of cost/GB vs other 2nd tier storage types
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots