AWS Serverless Application Repository vs. Red Hat OpenShift
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS Serverless Application Repository | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | The AWS Serverless Application Repository is a managed repository for serverless applications. It enables teams, organizations, and individual developers to store and share reusable applications, and easily assemble and deploy serverless architectures in powerful new ways. Using the Serverless Application Repository, users don't need to clone, build, package, or publish source code to AWS before deploying it. | N/A |
Red Hat OpenShift | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications. | $0.08 per hour |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Red Hat OpenShift | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 261 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 217 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Happy with the feature set 266 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Implementation went as expected 211 Answers | |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Red Hat OpenShift | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.8 |
| Usability | - | 7.6 |
| Availability | - | 5.5 |
| Performance | - | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.3 |
| In-Person Training | - | 7.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.6 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 8.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 7.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Usability | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Online Training | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |
