TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS Serverless Application Repository vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Serverless Application Repository

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AThe AWS Serverless Application Repository is a managed repository for serverless applications. It enables teams, organizations, and individual developers to store and share reusable applications, and easily assemble and deploy serverless architectures in powerful new ways. Using the Serverless Application Repository, users don't need to clone, build, package, or publish source code to AWS before deploying it.N/A

    Red Hat OpenShift

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    $0.08

    per hour

    Pricing
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    261 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    217 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    266 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    174 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    211 Answers
    Features
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of AWS Serverless Application Repository and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    AWS Serverless Application Repository
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    8.2
    192 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.4164 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings9.2182 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.8168 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.9151 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings8.3170 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.3157 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings8.5166 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.4159 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.8168 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings7.5165 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.3169 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (206 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (128 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.3
    (8 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS Serverless Application RepositoryRed Hat OpenShift
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Red Hat OpenShift, despite its complexity and overhead, remains the most complete and enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform available. It excels in research projects like ours, where we need robust CI/CD, GPU scheduling, and tight integration with tools like Jupyter, OpenDataHub, and Quiskit. Its security, scalability, and operator ecosystem make it ideal for experimental and production-grade AI workloads. However, for simpler general hosting tasks—such as serving static websites or lightweight backend services—we find traditional VMs, Docker, or LXD more practical and resource-efficient. Red Hat OpenShift shines in complex, container-native workflows, but can be overkill for basic infrastructure needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    • OpenShift virtualization has a little room for improvement. I'm coming from it as a Rev customer. There's some things in that OpenShift virtualization that were in Rev that I would like to see in OpenShift virtualization. I realized that they're chasing the VMware crowd and that's fine, but from us old Rev customers, we'd like to see some things that was in Rev around via migration and things of that nature that could be in OpenShift virtualization, I hope is being planned to be put in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Overall, this platform is beneficial. The only downsides we have encountered have been with pods that occasionally hang. This results in resources being dedicated to dead or zombie pods. Over time, these wasted resources occasionally cause us issues, and we have had difficulty monitoring these pods. However, this issue does not overshadow the benefits we get from Openshift.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Every time we need to get support all the Red Hat team move forward looking to solve the problem. Sometimes this was not easy and requires the scalation to product team, and we always get a response. Most of the minor issues were solved with the information from access.redhat.com
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    • All of the above. Red Hat OpenShift going into a developer-type setting can be stood up very quickly. There's a very short period to have developers onboard to it and they're able to become productive much faster than a grow your own type solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots