TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Azure SQL Managed Instance

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AAzure SQL Managed Instance is a scalable cloud database service that combines SQL Server database engine compatibility with a fully managed and evergreen platform as a service.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Editions & Modules
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of AWS Lambda and Azure SQL Managed Instance
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    9.3
    3 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Azure SQL Managed Instance
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of AWS Lambda and Azure SQL Managed Instance
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Azure SQL Managed Instance
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of AWS Lambda and Azure SQL Managed Instance
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Azure SQL Managed Instance
    -
    Ratings
    Programming Language Diversity9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of AWS Lambda and Azure SQL Managed Instance
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Azure SQL Managed Instance
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (48 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (13 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS LambdaAzure SQL Managed Instance
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Data management scenarios where there is a strong need to provide dynamic context for web based applications. Also can work as an infrastructure piece for ticketing systems without relying on another set of database software. The ease of importing data from Microsoft Excel &/or .csv files makes this really easy to use when importing data into the managed instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • executes the queries efficiently
    • has tools/dashboards to show where the query problems lie
    • alerting for problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • hard to use without Microsoft knowledge
    • Intimidating CLI
    • Commands are not intuitive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    it runs the workload very well without causing any issues to the business. there are many applications running on Azure SQL Managed Instances in my organization. Most users are happy with its performance. Is able to provide good dashboard for the visibility of the workload. Can add cpu without a downtime to deal with high workload.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure to our enviironment where we have everything integrated stacks up far better than MySQL where we would have to reinvent and use everything to fit a MySQL environment including the data and the commands within that data. Furthermore, doesn't work really well on SQL Management Studio which makes it completely useless for what we are trying to do.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • it had a positive impact to my business and allowed me to be able to move my workload from on-premise to cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots