AWS Compute Optimizer vs. IBM Cloudability

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Compute Optimizer
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AWS Compute Optimizer recommends optimal AWS Compute resources for workloads to reduce costs and improve performance by using machine learning to analyze historical utilization metrics. Over-provisioning compute can lead to unnecessary infrastructure cost and under-provisioning compute can lead to poor application performance. Compute Optimizer helps users choose the optimal Amazon EC2 instance types, including those that are part of an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group, based on utilization data.N/A
IBM Cloudability
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloudability is a cloud cost management and optimization tool that enables IT, finance, and business teams to optimize their costs and communicate the business value of the cloud.N/A
Pricing
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Best Alternatives
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS Compute OptimizerIBM Cloudability
Likelihood to Recommend
AWS Compute Optimizer works well if you are using AWS as the core tech stack. If you are on mixed cloud deployments, then it is less appropriate because it can only give you a partial view. It might be helpful to use a tool that aggregates the usage and billing data from multiple platforms instead.
Read full review
Good tool to start FinOps journey in a medium sized (or above) company. Currently missing AI capabilities that are now available with a lot of FinOps vendors in the market. Also, apptio currently does not have FOCUS dataset nomenclature, that can be worked upon.
Read full review
Pros
  • Detailed analysis of resource uses
  • Suggestion to reduce cost
  • Easy to use
Read full review
  • It shows the visibility into the cost and a single pane of glass for all of our cloud providers, multiple products in those multi-cloud. So it shows us our spending across the cloud by vendor, by product, and by all the tags that we have in the cloud. So it gives us visibility into many different directions in our cost.
Read full review
Cons
  • Although it works great for AWS services but they should give a third party cost add option
  • Many features only work when there is large data available
  • sometime suggestions are not relevant to business problem we address
Read full review
  • It would be good to see if it offers integrations with wide variety of tools like Service NOW, MS Teams, DataDog, Slack and also with cloud native Notification services like SNS etc.
  • It would be great if Apptio cloudability provides comprehensive documentation and training
  • There is scope for improvement on Enhanced cost optimization Algorithms.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We decided to build our own home-grown FinOps tool, but the results of the proof of concept were very promising.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very strong tool, nearly as clunky as older tools like CloudCheckr and much more fully featured than newer tools like Pileus. It's easy to get started with drilling into data for experienced FinOps users; others end users have a learning curve, but I don't think that's specific to Apptio Cloudability. The biggest drawback I find is the tool is buggier than others (e.g. CloudHealth), and constantly having to refresh a browser makes for a poor user experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Only been 1 or 2 occaisions when not available, in 3 years
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Afternoons tend to be a little slower, due to US traffic I assume
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
While there have been few support cases where the experience was good. But in multiple support cases it's firstly delayed and even after weeks or months of time, team is not able to provide us with the RCA of the issue. All they are claiming is the issue is now fixed which I still see coming back after few days or weeks as we've never identified and addressed the root cause.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Training was adequate, but the real learning begins when you start using the product, like most things. All major functions were covered so as an entry point, was a good introduction to the product. The training pace was good as well, the areas were covered in decent depth, without being too much of an information overload.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Within months
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Although both work in the same manner I prefer AWS cause our department mostly work on AWS technologies and it really makes our life easy in terms of cutting cost and making our application efficient and it gives a whole understanding of resource utilization. I recommend AWS Cost optimizer to all.
Read full review
I like IBM Cloudability compared to IBM SPSS Statistics because I think SPSS is a bit outdated. In my opinion, IBM Cloudability is more modern and helps present data better than SPSS could. Compared to Microsoft 365, I would say they are about even. One thing I like about Microsoft 365 compared to IBM Cloudability is data manipulation is a bit easier with formulas which I can't say I have been able to do with IBM Cloudability.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Works as designed
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has a very positive impact
  • Reduced the cost by a significant amount
  • Great understanding of resource utilization
Read full review
  • Apptio Cloudability has enabled us to charge back 100% of our cloud spend to our business users and on an automated basis through the use of ApptioOne
  • Apptio Cloudability's transparency and metrics have enabled us to save millions of dollars in cloud spend across our user base.
Read full review
ScreenShots