AWS CodeBuild vs. openSUSE KIWI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS CodeBuild
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy.
$0.01
Per Minute
openSUSE KIWI
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The openSUSE tool KIWI automates and supports the creation of Linux appliances, which are complete installations of a Linux system within a file, and deploying the image to hardware, virtualization, and containers.N/A
Pricing
AWS CodeBuildopenSUSE KIWI
Editions & Modules
general.1.small
$.005
Per Minute
general.1.medium
$.01
Per Minute
general.1.large
$.02
Per Minute
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS CodeBuildopenSUSE KIWI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS CodeBuildopenSUSE KIWI
User Ratings
AWS CodeBuildopenSUSE KIWI
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS CodeBuildopenSUSE KIWI
Likelihood to Recommend
It is really good for building projects in the cloud. If you try to do build the project first locally and then push that stack to the cloud it could take a lot of time. In this way, it also consumes a lot of resources in the computer and in the network.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Customization
  • Do code builds within a schedule or when the source code changes
  • Only pay for the build time used
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • It was difficult to create a branching strategy with GitHub. We had everything running from main, but in a true devops environment, we would like to incorporate a true branching strategy.
  • I would like to share build projects with each AWS account we utilize versus creating a build project in each account. It will allow us consistent deployments across the board.
  • The error logs are natively in AWS, but when developers do not have access, there is no way for them to view error logs for maintenance other than an admin who has access to share the error logs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It is a highly usable, well integrated CI/CD service, patricularly for AWS-centric organizations. It is a strong balance between simplicity and flexibility. Security was integrated with AWS Secrets Manager allowing secrets to be retrieved dynamically - a huge usability win for us. I did not enjoy the manual build for each environment
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I've used GitHub Actions compared to AWS CodeBuild - I enjoyed the integration with AWS from a codebuild perspective, but GitHub Actions and Workflows allowed us to create a reusable pipeline which is more in line with our devops structure. I enjoy AWS CodeBuild, but from a true continuous deployment, GitHub Actions was more fit.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • AWS CodeBuild was introduces as a core enabler for automating database deployments and enforcing a standardization across six environments. The standardization and quality control was well received.
  • Security was baked in reducing audit findings.
  • Deployments took minutes to update all environments compared to hours. It helped us a lot to reduce drift and deploy consistently.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots