AWS Batch vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Batch
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
With AWS Batch, users package the code for batch jobs, specify dependencies, and submit batch jobs using the AWS Management Console, CLIs, or SDKs. AWS Batch allows users to specify execution parameters and job dependencies, and facilitates integration with a broad range of popular batch computing workflow engines and languages (e.g., Pegasus WMS, Luigi, Nextflow, Metaflow, Apache Airflow, and AWS Step Functions).N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security (formerly from McAfee) to give users a real-time view of running workloads through detecting workloads and pods. This product can integrate with both public and private cloud infrastructures.N/A
Pricing
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Features
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
AWS Batch
7.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS BatchTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Start with reviewing all your jobs, consolidating the timeline, and making a plan on what all jobs need to be prioritized. These can be optimized based on cost and performance. With a continuously changing workload, AWS Batch helps to build and automate the jobs across various resources. It also helps to manage the performance and workload.
Read full review
Suitable scenario: The McAfee Cloud Workload Security console has helped me a lot in saving physical resources. We no longer have to have a server and spend resources to maintain the console, everything is in the cloud. Unsuitable scenario: After the change to the cloud the McAfee Cloud Workload Security reduced many things that were made very easy when it was on a physical server. Active directory server integration with the console is a bit tricky. That should be improved and be somewhat more friendly when connecting to be able to migrate user machines.
Read full review
Pros
  • S3 amount of files
  • Easy to share files to other sites
  • Like that the files and folders can be open and public or completely private
  • I like that you can have double or mirroring in different Data Centers for Data Recovery
Read full review
  • Monitoring of detected threats
  • Checking the status of antivirus agents
  • Monitoring of antivirus software installed
Read full review
Cons
  • Jobs monitoring dashboards are not matured
  • Documentation and support is something which can be improved
  • Sometime i faced the slow response or slow in performance i would say
Read full review
  • Improve integration with windows server active directory.
  • The monitoring of the implementation of missing components of the antivirus should be improved.
Read full review
Usability
Key advantages include cost-effectiveness through dynamic resource provisioning and the use of spot instances. It auto-scales to meet workload demands, allowing easy job submission via the AWS Management Console or SDKs. It integrates seamlessly with other services like S3 and CloudWatch. It features automatic retries for failed jobs. It allows for a custom computing environment tailored to specific needs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CF did not have a way to store the videos and I did not want to do so in YouTube because of privacy reasons.
Read full review
We use McAfee Endpoint Security on user PCs and I must say that it is an excellent antivirus. The alerts we have had have been resolved without any problem. I totally recommend it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well compared to the cost of having multiple lambda's or some other custom solution working, it has has a postiive impact
  • Helped in orchestrating the jobs, has saved time of developers
Read full review
  • Improved resource savings in terms of physical infrastructure.
Read full review
ScreenShots