AWS Batch vs. Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)

AWS Batch

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
AWS Batch	Score 6.7 out of 10	N/A	With AWS Batch, users package the code for batch jobs, specify dependencies, and submit batch jobs using the AWS Management Console, CLIs, or SDKs. AWS Batch allows users to specify execution parameters and job dependencies, and facilitates integration with a broad range of popular batch computing workflow engines and languages (e.g., Pegasus WMS, Luigi, Nextflow, Metaflow, Apache Airflow, and AWS Step Functions).	N/A
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager drives continuous health in dynamic data center environments, whether on-premises or in a public cloud. The real‑time decision engine provides automatable actions that adjust infrastructure resources at every layer of the stack to ensure the performance of your applications. When your infrastructure is continuously performant, your teams can focus on what matters to the business.	N/A

Pricing

AWS Batch

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
AWS Batch	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	AWS Batch	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)

Features

AWS Batch

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)

Workload Automation

Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
	AWS Batch 7.3 Ratings 12% below category average	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM) 8.6 Ratings 4% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling	6.00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings
Central monitoring	8.00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings
Logging	10.00 Ratings	8.10 Ratings
Alerts and notifications	5.00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Analysis and visualization	5.90 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Application integration	8.70 Ratings	8.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	AWS Batch	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Apache Airflow Score 8.6 out of 10	Apache Airflow Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises	Control-M Score 9.3 out of 10	Control-M Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	AWS Batch	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)
Likelihood to Recommend	5.0 (0 ratings)	8.9 (0 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	AWS Batch	Cisco Workload Optimization Manager (WOM)
Likelihood to Recommend	Start with reviewing all your jobs, consolidating the timeline, and making a plan on what all jobs need to be prioritized. These can be optimized based on cost and performance. With a continuously changing workload, AWS Batch helps to build and automate the jobs across various resources. It also helps to manage the performance and workload. Incentivized Ashwin Vinod Lead, Analytics & Strategy Read full review	Cisco Workload Optimization is there to allow tasks to be optimized, prioritized, and facilitated to increase the company's growth and expansion direction. More so, Cisco Workload Optimization brings the ideals of solid engagement, where the collaboration comes in, and the innovations among other procedures suit the company's needs. Cisco Workload Optimization has a consistent approach to controlling the resources for a specific job role. Incentivized SL Steve Licky Systems Software Engineer Read full review
Pros	S3 amount of files Easy to share files to other sites Like that the files and folders can be open and public or completely private I like that you can have double or mirroring in different Data Centers for Data Recovery Incentivized MD Michelle Duffy Owner Read full review	Automated actions alerts and config Monitoring apps Managing apps and resources Incentivized Gerardo Huerta Robles Ingeniero Consultor Read full review
Cons	Jobs monitoring dashboards are not matured Documentation and support is something which can be improved Sometime i faced the slow response or slow in performance i would say Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	User Interface Modern Feel Incentivized Luke Villareal Owner \| Co-Founder Read full review
Usability	Key advantages include cost-effectiveness through dynamic resource provisioning and the use of spot instances. It auto-scales to meet workload demands, allowing easy job submission via the AWS Management Console or SDKs. It integrates seamlessly with other services like S3 and CloudWatch. It features automatic retries for failed jobs. It allows for a custom computing environment tailored to specific needs Incentivized Madhav Pujara Software Enginner Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	CF did not have a way to store the videos and I did not want to do so in YouTube because of privacy reasons. Incentivized MD Michelle Duffy Owner Read full review	Easy integration and more user-friendly. We selected this platform because of the price and the name. Honestly, Cisco is better known for the technology than a no-name brand for us, so it was easier to persuade upper management than explain who the company is for another competitor in an RFP. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Well compared to the cost of having multiple lambda's or some other custom solution working, it has has a postiive impact Helped in orchestrating the jobs, has saved time of developers Incentivized Madhav Pujara Software Enginner Read full review	Lower costs with accurate sizing. Great workload performance. Utilization and workload density. Incentivized Sarah Urbani It tehcnician Read full review
ScreenShots