AWS Backup vs. Oracle Real Application Clusters

AWS [Backup] does what it intends on doing. AWS [Backup] is very fast, however, for that speed, you'll end up with a high bill at the end of the month. Compared to competitors, AWS [Backup] is a lot more expensive than others. However, I believe it makes it up in it's versatility - there's no company more compatible with others than AWS.

Incentivized

Currently, as per RAC configuration, one node RAC or multinode RAC configuration is there. Customers who don't have licenses to run RAC simultaneously in multiple servers at the same time can opt for one node RAC configuration while they can still have the flavour of failover.

Incentivized

• Centralized management - single pane of glass to manage backups for multiple AWS services.
• Encryption - integrates with KMS to encrypt backup data at rest and in transit.
• Cross Account management - manage backups across multiple AWS accounts with AWS organizations.

Incentivized

• Horizontal scalability
• Seamless failover
• No impact on business during failover

Incentivized

• Lacks built-in features for granular recovery, such as files or DB records, without restoring the entire backup.
• Complexity - managing backups with multiple rules and resources, with limitations on the number of tags and resources per plan.
• D/R recovery orchestration - does not offer advanced D/R orchestration.

Incentivized

• Oracle Real Application Clusters is totally dependant on DBA's . It would be great if it can be simplified somehow
• Its license cost
• Enabling usage in standard edition

Incentivized

Overall because I can sell it white labeled and use my white labeled software like CloudBerry and the native backup apps on my synology NAS servers to store things in real time and do duplication and disaster recovery directly to it was game changing for my client in the advertising world they are never down now.

Incentivized

Support for AWS Backup is by Amazon itself so it is solid as always. If you have a business or higher level support plan you'll have no trouble getting engineers or other staff on the job to help you with whatever comes up.

Incentivized

Linode requires a minimum data purchase for their S3 storage solution. While the convenience of being able to mount the drive directly is great, it isn't the best for small amounts of data for our different customers. I initially tried there other backup solution but they couldn't guarantee where the data would be stored in relation to the server we were using. The risk being an incident in our near our server could result in the loss of our backup as well.

Incentivized

Choosing Oracle Real Application Clusters over SQL Server Cluster was actually a business requirement. As the nature of business demanded Oracle RDBMS. As a clustering solution, RAC comes into the picture easily, so it was not a hard choice to choose Oracle Real Application Clusters over SQL Server.

Incentivized

• With AWS Backup we can restore a resource in minutes
• With AWS Backup we don't need to worry if a resources is being backed up or not, the plan you can configure can cover all resources
• With AWS Backup you can plan for Disaster Recovery as it lets you copy the backup to other account or region

Incentivized

• Outage on application downtime has greatly reduced
• Customers confirmed, performance wise, it has been better after deployment of Oracle Real Application Clusters
• Shared storage

Incentivized