Avolution ABACUS vs. SAP PowerDesigner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Avolution ABACUS
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
ABACUS, from Australian software company Avolution, is an enterprise architecture modeling tool.N/A
SAP PowerDesigner
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP PowerDesigner (formerly from Sybase) is an enterprise data architecture modeling tool, used to Build a blueprint of the current enterprise architecture and visualize the impact of change before it happens.N/A
Pricing
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Best Alternatives
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Small Businesses
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Avolution ABACUSSAP PowerDesigner
Likelihood to Recommend
- Very easy to use for Enterprise Architects
- Accelerates time to value
- integrates with Avolution Enterprise
- Integrates with ITSM solutions
- import/export functionality is simple & flexible
Read full review
SAP PowerDesigner allows our team of data modelers to work and collaborate from a single repository and single data dictionary. This helps enforce consistency as data elements are referenced in other objects. Prior to our use of PD, we might have an element named "ppt" in one table, "participant" in another table and "part" in a third table. By forcing everything to be used from the data dictionary, we avoid these situations because everyone has to go to the dictionary. And we are able to easily do peer reviews on models before they are released because we are collaborating through the use of the repository.
Read full review
Pros
  • Modelling the Enterprise through the creation of catalogues and matrices of Enterprise information
  • Creation of views to supports strategy execution and decision making
  • Central storage of Enterprise information
  • Management of a agreed meta model
Read full review
  • Impact Analysis
  • The domain structure helps you to handle different data types to unify.
  • Moving between from conceptual model to logical model and from logical model to physical model is so easy.
  • It also excels at implementation of database vendor-specific physical options.
  • The repository structure helps you to use in multi developer and architect based organizations by the check in and check out mechanism.
  • It also has a fully configurable naming convention implementation.
  • Coloring is simple with format copying and pasting option.
Read full review
Cons
  • More standard connectors for integration with other modeling tools could be beneficial for companies having legacy tools/fragmented toolsets.
  • Better automated diagramming features would be useful.
Read full review
  • It took some time to figure out how to leverage the power of the repository. Some better examples in the documentation would have been helpful.
Read full review
Support Rating
Highly knowledgable team and fast response times
Read full review
We did have to reach out to support to learn how to properly utilize the repository feature and share the data model across many developers. Support was able to help us get this set up correctly. The downside was it took us several weeks before we gave up and contacted support. We should have done that earlier. I would say, however, the documentation wasn't clear on how to do this. So support was a great big help!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
More flexible and user friendly interface. Better customization enables organisations to grow based on their maturity and requirements Avolution is highly rated on Gartner and Forrester reviews
Read full review
The version of ErWin we had didn't support the repository for document sharing and data dictionary sharing. Our version of PD does so we were able to leverage that and have a central repository that is shared among the team members. That really helped to give us consistency across our databases. PD is easy to use, but getting the repository set up properly was a little tricky.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Enabled rationalization of IT portfolio to save costs
  • Supporting of strategic planning of EA and IT initiatives
Read full review
  • Standardization of models
  • Impact Analysis
  • Graphical User Interface
  • Ease of deployment
Read full review
ScreenShots