AVEVA Historian vs. M3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AVEVA Historian
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
AVEVA Historian, formerly from Wonderware, is a time-series optimized data store, allowing the user to capture and store high-fidelity industrial big data, to unlock trapped potential for operational improvements.N/A
M3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
M3 is a Prometheus compatible, metrics engine that provides visibility, consisting of 3 simple components for ingestion and streaming aggregation, a timeseries database, and a real-time query engine. It is available free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license, and was originally conceived and created by developers at Uber. Docker is not required but suggested as the easiest way to run and manage M3DB.N/A
Pricing
AVEVA HistorianM3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AVEVA HistorianM3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AVEVA HistorianM3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
User Ratings
AVEVA HistorianM3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AVEVA HistorianM3 Open Source Metrics Engine (M3DB)
Likelihood to Recommend
Paired with Citect SCADA or System Platform, this is an excellent process historian. It also works well collecting OPC data. For basic data storage, retrieval, and analysis, this is well suited. This is not well suited for very large deployments. Multiple instances would need to be used to scale up, and the data fed into a second-tier/enterprise historian for corporate user consumption.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Data storage--multiple data sources stream data in real time; it is stored without issue
  • Data retrieval--small to moderate queries and trends are generally fast and efficient
  • Cost effectiveness--it is one of the cheaper (non-enterprise) historian offers and therefore is good value for money (with a reduced feature set)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Query performance--for very long-term/large queries; the latest version which we are yet to commission has some improvements in this area
  • User interface--the trend, query, and Excel add-ins are basic and could do with a refresh; web-based clients are a paid add-on and less full featured, so not a true replacement
  • Connectivity--Wonderware System Platform driver packs are required for additional data source types, where native connectors are not provided by other products
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
AVEVA Historian, formerly Wonderware, was the best of the process tier historians in terms of reliability and functionality. It is still under development and not a "dead" product. It is also more cost effective than the more full-featured enterprise historians, such as PI, which our organization is not yet ready for. The feature set is at the right cost level, coupled with current support, were the key factors in the decision.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Increased efficiency, reduction in labour for preparing reports--data is available to be queried and reported with less effort
  • Increased production efficiency--near real-time data availability and comparisons to historical data has been used to make faster and better operational decisions
  • Increased reliability--data has been used for maintenance optimization and planning purposes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots