Avatar Systems vs. geoSCOUT

Avatar Systems is appropriate for basic routine medical visit charting. In my opinion, I would not use it for anythin beyond that. I was not impressed with Avatar's capabilities and customization. The system is great for locked down user level permissions.

Incentivized

GeoSCOUT is ideal for daily oil and gas workflows of a geologist or engineer or for academic research purposes. Great for fluid analysis and production data and for understanding rig activity.

Incentivized

• Locked down permissions for access

Incentivized

• Production Analysis tool is strong for quick decline work
• Annotations functionality helps with defining potential projects
• Export tools are useful in quickly dumping out raw data for analysis

Incentivized

• customer service
• customization
• response times to tickets
• tier one support
• post transition support
• functionality improvements for templates
• more robust options for more than basic visit types

Incentivized

• Must have several geoSCOUT windows open at once (well ticket, main screen, others if using).

Incentivized

In my opinion, Avatar Systems would rank low on my list when compared to the others.

Incentivized

Accumap is also a similar tool. The two tools contain the same information, although geoSCOUT has extra modules which have been somewhat useful. For the most part, engineers pull raw production, completions and facilities data. geoSCOUT is better for visualizing plans and allowing toggling of different considerations using the layer manager.

Incentivized

• Avatar Systems didn't meet all of our needs, but would for a private practice

Incentivized

• Visualizing data
• Integral part to research

Incentivized