Auvik vs. Elecard Boro
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Auvik | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Auvik Network Management is a vendor-agnostic cloud-based network monitoring and management solution providing automated network discovery. Auvik requires no service hardware or disruptive maintenance cycles and provides onboarding and training for new and existing users. Auvik delivers visibility and automation to reduce friction for IT teams and allow them to give end users the freedom to work wherever and however they… | N/A |
Elecard Boro | Score8 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | IPTV, OTT, DVB quality monitoring software. Boro provides effective control of content delivery networks and ensures localization of common violations. Boro probes can be distributed across the entire network: at head-end station, at input streams monitoring points and after transcoding, multiplexing and encrypting modules. They provide continuous non-stop monitoring & analysis and instantly notify of any ETSI TR 101 290 errors or HLS events via Email, SNMP, Webhook, PagerDuty, Telegram. | $0 |
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing is calculated per number of switches, routers, firewalls, and controllers. Everything else is monitored for free. | Monthly, annual fee for the service and perpetual license for Boro solution | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
97% Would buy again 113 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 92 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 114 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 92 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Pulseway Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9.3 out of 10 | Cisco Meraki Dashboard Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score10 out of 10 | Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued) Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.8 | - |
| Usability | 7.3 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 8.2 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.7 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 10.0 | - |
| Auvik | Elecard Boro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Auvik Screenshots | Elecard Boro Screenshots |














