AutomationNG vs. BugTracker.net

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AutomationNG
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Indecomm Global Services headquartered in New Jersey offers AutomationNG, a test automation and test management platform.N/A
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Features
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
AutomationNG
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
BugTracker.net
-
Ratings
Centralized test management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomationNGBugTracker.net
Likelihood to Recommend
AutomationNG is best suited for people with no programming language at all. It is easy to write tests and execute. Cross browser testing feature is the best part of this app. Cross browser testing can be tricky in other tools, but this app handles it very graciously. However, the tests are executed slowly compared to other tools like selenium but that requires programming knowledge
Read full review
It is a great Bug Tracking tool when implemented and set up the correct way initially. If you find yourself in the position of having to go through and re name fields on a project level of having to do an overhaul of the user base you will find some frustrations, these are noted in the last question.
Read full review
Pros
  • Doesnt require any programming knowledge
  • Test cases are written in simple English-like
  • Cross browser testing is supported and is easy to perform
  • Integration with Jira
  • Takes significantly less time to write test scripts
Read full review
  • Tracking technical issues and assigning for review and completion
  • Tracking final status and quality of an application or website
Read full review
Cons
  • UI is pretty outdated and needs major revamp
  • Test results UI can be improved
  • Speed of automation can be improved
Read full review
  • If you edit a field you have created (Username, status, custom fields) you lose the ability to sort/filter on this field.
  • It would be nice to add more custom fields on a project specific level. Currently you can only add 3
  • It would be FANTASTIC if you could sort/filter on Project Specific custom fields.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
BugTracker.net works for what we need it to do from a technology standpoint.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Easy to write the test cases hence saves lot of time.
  • Helps us to manage the tests and identify bugs quite early
  • Cross browser testing is a major feature
Read full review
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
ScreenShots