TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAutodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.

    $480

    per user/per year

    Autodesk Build

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AAutodesk Build, based on the former PlanGrid, is construction productivity software. It includes tools to collaborate, collect, and manage project information throughout the project’s construction and operations lifespan. It enables document centralization and tracking.

    $39

    user per month

    Pricing
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Editions & Modules
    Autodesk Bim 360
    $480.00
    per user/per year
    Nailgun
    $39
    user per month
    Dozer
    $59
    user per month
    Crane
    $139
    user per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Considered Both Products
    Autodesk
    Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    Integration with glue and field is the primary reason why Docs is better than PlanGrid. I would like for them to remove those silos however and have it under one platform. Unfortunately, it seems like Autodesk swallows up all the small companies so you are more likely to have …
    Incentivized
    Autodesk
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Procore and PlanGrid are the most direct competitors. The pricing structures are very dynamically different between PlanGrid and Procore. Procore tends to succeed better in the "project management" realm, while PlanGrid succeeds far beyond Procore in its ability to deal with …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    We use Bluebeam and PlanGrid on a daily basis for different purposes. Bluebeam does some things better than PlanGrid, but these are things that PlanGrid was not really designed to do. However, Plangrid is the best when it come to punchlists, and no other product that I have …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Asset Management
    Comparison of Asset Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Autodesk Build
    Feature
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Tracking of all physical assets6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Autodesk Build
    Feature
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    6.2
    4 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards4.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports7.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data exportability7.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Construction Project & Field Management
    Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Autodesk Build
    Feature
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    6.8
    13 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Autodesk Build
    6.5
    58 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Plan distribution & viewing9.913 Ratings7.057 Ratings
    Plan markups & sharing10.013 Ratings6.057 Ratings
    Issue tracking & punchlists8.212 Ratings5.052 Ratings
    Photo documentation5.312 Ratings9.049 Ratings
    Jobsite reports4.411 Ratings9.037 Ratings
    Document sharing10.012 Ratings8.056 Ratings
    RFI tools4.311 Ratings5.039 Ratings
    Collaboration & approvals9.812 Ratings8.043 Ratings
    As-built drawings4.410 Ratings5.043 Ratings
    Mobile app3.011 Ratings3.055 Ratings
    Submittal design and management6.310 Ratings00 Ratings
    Checklists4.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Meeting Minutes9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Specifications5.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change orders8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Estimating
    Comparison of Estimating features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Autodesk Build
    Feature
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    4.3
    3 Ratings
    60% below category average
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Takeoff tools4.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Job costing3.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost databases8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost calculator2.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bid creation3.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Small Businesses
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.2 out of 10
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Bluebeam
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    InEight
    Score8.3 out of 10
    InEight
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (13 ratings)
    7.0
    (70 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (52 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProAutodesk Build
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Autodesk
    Autodesk Bim 360 is well suited to the majority of construction projects in my opinion. On the construction side I could see how the straightforward nature of the platform would be well liked. The new update with the widgets is a great touch and allows for ease of site visits by showcasing good to know info like project location on a map and the local weather. You can also customize the "widgets" as you see fit to add more information if necessary to the home screen. From my experience as a LEED consultant, Bim 360 does not differ much from other platforms used for submittal review like Procore. It is easy enough to search for what you want but searches do take a while and you need to move the cursor over every time you search and do not find what you're looking for, which seems very unnecessary. Overall it is fine for reviewing documentation but isn't anything extraordinary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    PlanGrid performs really well in all aspects of construction from the general to the sub/trade. The platform distributes and communicates project documentation in an extremely user-friendly manner. As with most software, it is cheaper the larger the scale of the project. In situations where the project is relatively small, and the trade contracts are also of relatively low dollar value, the product can be cost-prohibitive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Autodesk
    • It helps to collaborate on different components of projects that work according to different specifications in one place.
    • With this the client can have all date at once where they can review all things.
    • The place where an architect and other Engineers coordinate to get a full-fledged model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Plangrid is the best SaaS I have seen for ease of uploading construction plans and automated organization of those plans.
    • For companies that are not using other products for mobile access, the Plangrid mobile apps are perfect to allow people on and off site to share and collaborate in many phases of construction project documentation.
    • Plangrid has a very responsive technical support team (although it is pretty much email only).
    • Plangrid's website layout is easy to use and understand and allows new users to jump right in and do basic to moderate tasks without little training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Autodesk
    • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
    • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
    • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
    • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
    • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
    • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • The photo attachment process is a bit complicated. In ProCore (another similar software I've used), you can upload photos directly into RFIs for your reference, or into e-mails. For PlanGrid, you have to first upload the photo into the documents tab, then link them into the RFI. It's not intuitive and can add confusion to the documents tab.
    • Photos can't be directly uploaded. Between different devices and colleagues, it's possible you'll get an important photo outside of the PlanGrid photo capture feature within its app. Again, it's complicated for users to use.
    • In their new drawings viewer, the icons for actions do not have icons available. I had to use them all in order to understand what they meant, and I'm fairly tech savvy. I'm not sure if a new person to PlanGrid will pick up on each icon's abilities very easily.
    • There's no all-in-one solution in CM, but PlanGrid is fairly barebones, and I don't believe it has any ability to connect to other software. There's no ability to take meeting munites; you can hack the field reports feature to accomplish this, but it's clear that was not the intent of the designers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    We are at the point where we have shown our teams what is possible with this software. We cannot take it away and go back to the way we used to do things. I think that they would push back on us to give them access to something electronic. It is a good program that we will continue to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Autodesk
    It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Hard to get the hang of this software, but with time it become very repetitive and easier to navigate. I have used this software for over a year now and the constant updates by Autodesk have made the software better and better to use at work. This allows me to use this tool more effectively
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Autodesk
    AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Online chat during business hours is extremely helpful. The Plangrid staff has gone above and beyond many times to help us. One time they even offered to completely rebuild our 900+ sheet project so I could slip sheet a few old drawing revisions! This undoubtedly would have taken hours on Plangrid's end. They are always responsive and are continually improving, listening to user feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Autodesk
    The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists and punch lists created for us by others is optimal compared to the competition. We chose Bim360 over other options due to its ability to import out of other software programs directly into the system, adding reports in one location and then distributing it to subcontractors and internally from there to fix deficiencies. It does the tracking, importing, markups of pictures and document viewing well and fulfills our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Plangrid, while not serving the external document distribution function, is unrivaled for internal document distribution and sharing in the construction industry. The speed at which documents are navigatable, the ability to download your projects for viewing without an internet connection, and the document mark-up and photo tools place it head and shoulders above the competition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Autodesk
    • We are able to complete a design quicker.
    • The fact that your files are not on your servers. Anytime that the Autodesk servers go down you are down; it does not happen very often but when it does there is nothing you can do about it except wait.
    • Because of how BIM360 licensing is setup it does force you to manage the personnel on a project closer. This can at times be viewed as a negative but in the long run is positive because with better management comes better profit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • It helped us "wow" a joint commission survey in 2016 and have a successful survey because he loved how we could access plans on an iPad, check suite sizes, and didn't have to carry around huge, heavy sets of life safety plans.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Autodesk Build Screenshots

    Screenshot of No confusing folders - all your plans at your fingertips.Screenshot of Easy overlay to visually detect changes or clashes.Screenshot of Track issues directly on the plan, including descriptions, photos, cost, and schedule impacts.Screenshot of Mark up plans for instant communication between field and office.Screenshot of Attach any kind of construction documents to your plans, including 360 photos.Screenshot of Track, review, and submit all your field reports on a mobile device.