Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
The Autodesk Construction Cloud provides a bundle of construction management products to suite various use cases. Current bundles include Construction Operations, Preconstruction, as well as Virtual Design and Construction.
N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Autodesk Construction Cloud
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.2
Ratings
21% below category average
Autodesk Construction Cloud
-
Ratings
Dashboards
4.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
Autodesk Construction Cloud
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
5.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
4.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
4.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
9.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
4.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
4.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
5.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
I think if you're a solo practitioner without a team, it might not be worth having Autodesk Construction Cloud. But if you do have a team, Autodesk Construction Cloud is a must. Having multiple users working simultaneously on the same project is something I truly appreciate. It greatly improves the team's workflow. Also, if you frequently share documentation, models, etc., with consultants, it's very useful.
Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
It's a very powerful collaboration tool. It enables efficient teamwork by allowing real-time collaboration among multiple users, regardless of location. It centralizes all project documentation, making it easy to manage and share files, models, and updates. It is also very useful for everyone to easily identify the latest issued documents. This greatly enhances communication within the team and with external consultants.
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.