Autodesk 3ds Max vs. Firefox Reality

Scenarios where Autodesk 3ds Max is well suited: 1. Modeling less complex geometries. 2. For beginners it is good, meshes, poly's, vertexes etc can be easily understood. 3. Easy UI and interoperability. Scenarios where it is less appropriate: 1. Inbuild Rendering (Scanline) can be made better. 2. Performance over low end/Old Pc's need refinement. 3. Bulky Size on disk. 4. Animation is the area which can be made better also.

Incentivized

Especially in the university context, Firefox Reality has a particularly high utility value as an open-source application. Wherever content is not only conveyed in 2D but also in 3D, Firefox Reality is a safe and powerful browser that can be used on all common VR glasses. The low administration effort and the clear interface provide both teachers and learners with great value.

• V-Ray 3ds Max is an awesome third-party plugin for architecture renders in 3ds Max.
• Complicated models can be made in a simple way in 3ds Max also P-particles, M flow works better then before.
• Interface is very easy to use. Very open, attractive, and very much ease of use for new users.

Incentivized

• Switch between 2D and 3D content.
• secure and fast browser for 3D content.
• Private Modus.
• Full screen and focus mode, cinema mode.

• working in 2d is very frustrating and unreliable. It just lacks the precision
• How scaling affects units (or doesn't) There needs to be a way for modifiers to address a change of scale in the object.
• Booleans are not intuitive. Especially for architecture, creating an opening and putting a door or a window is an incredibly cumbersome process.

Incentivized

• Speech recognition for voice control.
• Regular updates with new functions.
• Immediate security updates when security vulnerabilities become known.

It satisfies 95% of my 3d visualization need. The left over 5% is handled by a few other programs. If Max just can't perform a specific task I can do that elsewhere and then bring it back to Max to finish up. But, it's rare that this occurs in my work

Incentivized

It is a very difficult program to learn to use and even harder to use well. But once you get to using it it is a great software package to know how to use. Getting to be good at using it takes lots of use.

Incentivized

I have contacted support many times and have had a good experience. They have always been helpful

Incentivized

I use Blender, Maya is expensive learned it once but about the same as 3ds Max, just more expensive. Blender is great, open source and hard to learn, but work it. But since I have so much experience in 3ds Max it is my go to software.

Incentivized

Firefox Reality is convincing precisely because of the open source code. This also opens up the possibility for students to independently comprehend all aspects of the program in the code and thus learn a mature approach to the technology. Comparable products cannot offer this added value, which is particularly important in a university context.

• Having to take comments on and re-render a set of single multi-camera shots wastes a lot of time, as there is also an error "batch render." Slows down my completion of a job, even for the most minor image updates.
• Not being able to offer my freelance/contractor services period in-house on studios that are exclusively Mac. They don't even offer Autodesk 3ds Max as an option because they have never been able to see it in action. Huge loss of potential hires, with my 33year 3DStudio/Autodesk 3ds Max experience
• When most current version is needed I jump onto the subscription temporarily and this eats severely into my profits. As clients want lower and lower prices with international and AI competition. Especially when I know many International houses for a fact use pirated 3D software.

Incentivized

• Students engagement with VR-Technology.
• Low-threshold interaction with technology.
• Independent testing of the application in teaching-learning contexts.