AutoCAD Web vs. KYRO

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AutoCAD Web
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AutoCAD mobile (formerly AutoCAD 360) is an easy to use drawing and drafting app from Autodesk. It enables users in design, construction, and engineering industries to view, create, mark-up, edit, and share drawings on mobile devices.
$5
Per User Per Month
KYRO
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
KYRO is a unified construction management software that helps businesses bridge office teams with field crews on construction sites. Field crew members can utilize the voice notes functionality to record the day's updates in any language and share it instantly with reporting managers. The platform enables administrators to generate daily reports regarding expenditures, and invoices generated. Managers can use the optical character recognition (OCR) functionality to…
$95
per month per user
Pricing
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Editions & Modules
Premium
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Ultimate
$15.00
Per User Per Month
GROWTH
$95
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details**Kyro charges by the license or by the number of projects executed per year. Both pricing models require a minimum commitment of 50 (either licenses per month or projects per year). 20% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Features
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AutoCAD Web
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
KYRO
5.2
Ratings
38% below category average
Standard reports7.00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Data exportability9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
AutoCAD Web
7.6
Ratings
1% above category average
KYRO
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing7.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists4.10 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Photo documentation7.20 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Jobsite reports6.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
RFI tools7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals6.60 Ratings7.70 Ratings
As-built drawings9.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Mobile app10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Submittal design and management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
AutoCAD Web
-
Ratings
KYRO
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
Organization and location management00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
AutoCAD Web
-
Ratings
KYRO
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutoCAD WebKYRO
Likelihood to Recommend
We utilize the software for remote access to our projects. It has come in the handiest when an unexpected issue arises and we don't have the right project files on our laptop. We can easily access our information from the cloud. If you need to download/print to a PDF file, this software is not able to do this.
Read full review
I find KYRO to be an exceptionally well-designed product, ideally suited for both large and relatively smaller teams. Its ability to facilitate collaboration among multiple stakeholders on documents and plans is particularly impressive, making it an indispensable tool in managing diverse and complex construction projects. I appreciate KYRO's effectiveness in scenarios that demand meticulous tracking of labor hours and monitoring project progress to adhere to budget constraints. I perceive KYRO to be less suited for smaller residential projects that don't necessitate its extensive range of features. In such cases, simpler tools may suffice for effective management, making KYRO's advanced capabilities somewhat excessive for these smaller-scale projects.
Read full review
Pros
  • Download a file from my cloud storage site
  • The zoom in and zoom out tool
  • The cloud line type for further evaluation
  • The rotation function on 3D models
  • The displacement command for lines and blocks
  • The lines and polines drawing command
Read full review
  • Document Management: As a project manager, I've found KYRO's document management feature to be a game-changer. The ability to organize all project-related documents in one centralized location simplifies the workflow significantly. Their search functionality works well, allowing for quick and easy retrieval of documents from an extensive archive. This feature not only saves time but also enhances the overall efficiency of document handling in our projects
  • Time Management: The timesheet feature of KYRO has been instrumental in streamlining the process of recording and approving work hours. This functionality has been pivotal in efficiently tracking the hours logged by my crew, greatly aiding in effective time management and workforce coordination.
Read full review
Cons
  • Lite version should be available for lower end devices.
  • Editing drawings is a complex and time consuming task (even simple edits).
  • Finding drawings on the mobile is a hassle.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
This is so useful so we would like to keep renewing as Autocad 360 does. In fact we are very optimistic about the tools that come in every renewal because we will then have even more features available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I selected AutoCAD 360 because I had no idea how to work on in-house designs, plans, and geographic spaces. I invested part of the time in this innovative tool and I keep using it to have a clear idea of the materials that I should use in the different projects that I evaluate.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • AutoCAD 360 has saved a tremendous amount of time in file sharing and reviewing files. I know I'm getting repetitive, but having such a small convenience like this honestly saves so much time, and makes life so much easier.
Read full review
  • KYRO has led to a significant reduction in man-hours. The platform has been instrumental in tracking progress across various projects, and it has also streamlined administrative tasks, eliminating the need for manual approvals
  • I've found KYRO extremely effective in reducing errors during report submissions for both daily logs and forms. Its system maintains a record of previous entries, which serves as a reference for future submissions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

KYRO Screenshots

Screenshot of the Kyro home  pageScreenshot of a timesheetScreenshot of task detailsScreenshot of the Projects home page