AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN) vs. Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN) is an open solution designed to help large enterprises undergoing the digital transformation process to simplify the operations of their voice networks and increase call routing efficiency. It achieves this through consolidation of communications silos, connectivity with SIP trunk services and utilization of the corporate IP network to optimize call routing.N/A
Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Cradlepoint in Boise offers the all-inclusive NetCloud Solution Packages for branch, mobile, and IoT networks combine tailored NetCloud services with fit-for-purpose hardware and a comprehensive support plan. NetCloud Solution Packages are cloud-managed and deployable anywhere in days, not months. Cradlepoint acquired the NetCloud technology with original developer Pertino in December 2015, and integrated the platform into their own services by early 2016.N/A
Pricing
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
User Ratings
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AudioCodes Software-Defined Voice Network (SDvN)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I have yet to have any situation where Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine was "less appropirate". It's easy to use and understand and extremely effective for deploying Cradlepoints and maintaining them. The control over the Cradlepoint devices is remarkable, absolute and the product is very well suited and feature rich for the task,
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Support: They are always quick to respond.
  • The NetCloud service: It has never gone down in the four + years I have been using it.
  • Pricing is very competitive.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Cradlepoint NetCloud virtual backplane bandwidth is improving but could limit some very large enterprise customers without creative network segmentation.
  • Further improvements to simplify NetCloud Manager use would be appreciated.
  • User license management and compliance tools need to be clarified and simplified.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Device management is nearly the same as if you logged in locally, giving a familiar feel to the interface. Device group management can be cumbersome when pushing firmware updates.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Every time I have engaged support, it has been a satisfying experience. Because they cover such a wide range of applications, I do have to spend more time explaining our intended results and rationale than I would have to do with a more focused vendor, but it's a minor tradeoff for the value of saved time in every other aspect of the solution.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It is much easier to group your devices within NetCloud prior to deployment. We ran into issues of lost/changed settings when grouping devices that had already been deployed
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Before Cradlepoint NetCloud, firewall transversal was a challenge for telemedicine and required extensive and lengthy cooperation with client IT professionals. Interface selection and failover required application-level software on the host that would become inaccessible should a failover event go badly. We used several tools, each with their own management consoles, licensing plans, and learning curves to enable solutions. Much of that is a thing of the past with NetCloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • TCO vs traditional WAN was over 1,000% less
  • Increased connectivity improved security AND connectivity
Read full review
ScreenShots