Atlassian Bitbucket vs. GitLab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bitbucket
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Bitbucket is a Git repository and code collaboration platform, featuring automated testing and code deployment. Bitbucket Cloud Premium provides AI-powered development, more granular access controls, and enforced code quality, and Bitbucket Data Center provides a self-hosted option.
$0
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can…
$0
per month per user
Pricing
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
for up to 5 users
Standard
$3.30
per month per user
Premium
$6.60
per month per user
Bitbucket Data Center
starting at $44,000
per year 1 - 500
GitLab Essential
$0
per month per user
GitLab Premium
$29
per month per user
GitLab Ultimate
$99
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitbucketGitLab
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Considered Both Products
Bitbucket
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
GitHub has a huge community to support, so, beside the price, is the best tool I've used as a git server.
Gitlab is very similar to BitBucket, and for a free version as less limitations. Also is cheaper for companies, but doesn't have a smooth integration with JIRA. Also has a …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Both GitHub and Gitlab are viable alternatives to using Bitbucket, but one of them is not affordable for smaller teams that need to share repositories for free, and the other one is self-hosted, both creating costs that may not be affordable for a startup that is yet to have …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket excels at providing loads of customizability and a comprehensive suite of tools for the development life cycle. But it does it by adding a lot of complexity that has to be managed by someone (or some people). Competitors like GitHub and Gitlab are a little leaner. GitH…
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Gitlab has better CI pipeline integrations
GitHub is more widely used in the open-source community and hence it has a much bigger user base
Bitbucket is appropriate for companies with small to medium-sized teams, specially if using JIRA integration
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
While GitHub and Gitlab are also great tools to use, they offer fewer features than we can have with BitBucket. With Bitbucket we also have in integration with JIRA, which represents a considerable advantage for us.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
From a cost standpoint, Bitbucket is the winner if you fall outside of the ability to use the GitHub and Gitlab free tiers. Both of those solutions have their own merits, but from a cost saving perspective Bitbucket is more than likely going to be the most effective option.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I think Gitlab and Bitbucket are very similar. I am very familiar with git commands so its easy for me to use both. But I would still prefer Gitlab since it has few additional features like send merge request, approvers etc.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Of the three, we mostly use Gitlab the most. I don't know why as I was not part of the selection process. But if I'm to guess, this is an organization preference. Our company uses Bitbucket the most, while our partners either use Gitlab the most and sometimes ButBucket. But if …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket is good for private repositories and reliable CI/CD integration but it's getting behind GitHub which every day has more and more integrations and which in my opinion has a larger customer group. Gitlab also offers some good support for private repositories but the …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Gitlab provides lesser features compared to GitHub.
Gitlab/GitHub are both from a different company (Atlassian), which makes it tough to interrelate projects with other task management tools offered by Atlassian.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Gitlab: Gitlab has a more robust code management and review system, but does not have any automated deployments so additional tools (such as Jenkins) would be required.

Visual Studio Team System (Azure Dev Ops) - VSTS is a better overall platform, since it provides a more robust …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket is perfect for our business because it allows us to work on private projects and integrate seamlessly with our existing tools. They also provide a nice app called Sourcetree to help developers work on git environments without experience with git command-line …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I have used GitLab and GitHub in the past. While GitLab is good if you are finding an open source solution for your code management and GitHub is good for the open source contribution, Bitbucket is an ideal choice to build an enterprise level product. The ecosystem that Jira …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I have used GitHub and GitLab before working on Bitbucket. There is no huge reason to choose Bitbucket over others. The only thing I like more about Bitbucket is security and user interface!
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I didn't choose Bitbucket, but I hypothesize that my company chose it partly for its phenomenal integration with other Atlassian products such as Jira. Bitbucket has GitHub as a worthy competitor, but in my opinion, there are no real Jira Software competitors.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
At the time, the licensing was cheaper than the other options, and integrating with Jira was a plus.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
It doesn’t stack up against them. It is widely used because it comes in a great package with other Atlassian tools.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
We did select Bitbucket for a bit, but then we eventually moved away from using JIRA to different tools and as a result, it made more sense to move our source code to GitHub since it provides more features and is just much easier to use as everyone already knows how to use GitHu…
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket was my repo host of choice when it came to private repos, but now that GitHub offers free private repos I’ll probably just use them. If you want to manage branch protection though you’ll need a Pro membership for GitHub whereas it was free with Bitbucket.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket provides more features to version control and mange project sources. Build, test and deploy with integrated CI/CD. Benefit from configuration as code and fast feedback loops. Approve code review more efficiently with pull requests. Create a merge checklist with …
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
Bitbucket has been preferred because, in my opinion, it had a better UI, and easier integrations with things like Slack. Also, because it is an Atlassian-owned product, it integrates very very nicely with JIRA (which I've often used in conjuction with Bitbucket).
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I like the way it manages the repositories and the branches. Besides, the graphic part of the resolution of merge conflicts is much easier to edit from the Bitbucket interface than from the console.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I like the Bitbucket interface more. I feel it is much more professional, that's why I prefer it and I always use it.
Chose Atlassian Bitbucket
I selected Bitbucket due to the reasons I've listed before. It is free for individuals and small teams of up to five people. It allows for unlimited private and public repos. It integrates with JIRA automatically. It also has a nifty tool for existing repository importing which …
GitLab
Chose GitLab
When i was using the other platform, Some time i face down time, But GitLabs its not happening for single time. GitLab is having easy user interference as compared to other platforms. Pull Request, Code review, Issue tracking, Merging, Access control and User Roles is having a …
Chose GitLab
As mentioned earlier, the features like chart visualization sets it apart from the others. Other than that, GitLab is open source while other are not and comparatively more secure that its other counterparts. Also, GitLab supports adding other types of attachments which is not …
Chose GitLab
Gitlab offers the best support for CI/CD pipelines and the highest degree of customisation for workflows, permissions, and integrations. The integration of Bitbucket with JIRA is better than GitLab but CI/CD features are limited in comparison. GitLab's built-in Container …
Chose GitLab
It's much simpler than the competitors. The one important feature Gitlab stand out is the CI/CD pipeline. GitHub required integration with external CI tools but Gitlab has this feature built-in. Compare to Jenkins and TeamCity, It's easy to use without any additional Plugins. …
Chose GitLab
i have more exoerence in GitLab rather than Bitbucket . As personally , it is good for me to understand how things is going on. i have used personally and also in organisation . It is great for developer to see there 3 months ago code and also can come up with new solution to …
Chose GitLab
My feedback may not be important here because when I joined the company they already had GitLab and we still use it due to the ability to do CI/CD Integration, deployments, debugging, code owners approval, and Jira integration. So far we have not had any major blocker that has …
Chose GitLab
It was a management decision to use GitLab over other tools. It integrates well with RBAC using Terraform. Runners are easy to setup. Almost all the features the organization used before are available in GitLab.
Chose GitLab
For small projects or companies that do work on a few only code repositories selecting one of the git code hosting services like GitLab, GitHub, Bitbicket etc does not make a big difference.

But, if you are on a code development company that handles too many repositories and …
Chose GitLab
Software delivery is the key objective and GitLab made it much easier to hit the group quickly. It worked well with automation, and integrations with other SDLC tools used in the Organization and it is really easy to use. It's widely adopted and has the power to deliver what we …
Chose GitLab
Gitlab provided on par functionality and it provided a good option for us to self host which is very important for our business. We think the business continuity story is more solid with Gitlab.
Chose GitLab
GitLab is easy to access either from Linux or Windows tools. Better control from CMS or Linus shell. Better & Easy understanding of UIs even for freshers. Fast CLI executions & Better support forums in case of issues.
Chose GitLab
We are coming from Bitbucket, and we switch to Gitlab to improve the source code management and the reading, which is better on Gitlab. The Merge request flow is also better than Bitbucket. This allows us to use Gitlab CI, which is well-integrated. Compared to GitHub, it is …
Chose GitLab
More friendly interface and very intuitive.
Chose GitLab
GitLab is full DevOps product compare with others as just VCS with other product integration. We will have control and security measures with us.
Chose GitLab
More developer & collaborators friendly ui and features.
Gitlab provides user to have Private repository.
Lots of third party integration which work smooth.
Chose GitLab
  1. GitLab has all the necessary features that are required as part of modern software development life cycle.
  2. GitLab offers better pricing as compared to its competitors.
  3. GitLab is open-source as well.
Chose GitLab
All these tools implement the Git and version control tools. But GitHub I personally like it more because the easy options available in GitHub is not present in any other version control tool. Like cherry pick, pull request.
Chose GitLab
These tools do have quite a bit of crossover. However, with GitLab, we can set up our CI/CD pipeline more seamlessly as there are numerous workflows built straight into the tool. The last time I used GitLab this was not something it provided. Granted, it will work with outside …
Chose GitLab
We have chosen GitLab for simplicity, at the initial phases it does provide all the things we need but as the project is getting to the next stage we have trouble with pipelining and DevOps. So we moved to Azure DevOps later but overall GitLab is great for beginners it provides …
Chose GitLab
The best thing about GitLab is the pricing and the smooth and fast onboarding. The base plan itself covers most use cases in Gitlab and that too is completely free, this gives the small companies or the startups the push they require at the beginning. Other than that Gitlab has …
Chose GitLab
The first thing is other products except GitLab is there is very costly and does not have any customise thing. Gitlab is an open-source license product that makes its use easier and more cost-effective that's why we have chosen Gitlab among other products with the same …
Features
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Bitbucket
8.1
3 Ratings
1% below category average
GitLab
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History9.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools4.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(66 ratings)
8.8
(142 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(4 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(4 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(14 ratings)
9.1
(11 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian BitbucketGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
As a team we need to push code into the repo on daily basis, Bitbucket has proven that is a reliable and secure server to save and get the code available in no time. The administration part is really easy and there's an extra tool for every developer profile either if you want to use the console or a GUI like Sourcetree.
Read full review
GitLab
GitLab is good if you work a lot with code and do complex repository actions. It gives you a very good overview of what were the states of your branches and the files in them at different stages in time. It's also way easier and more efficient to write pipelines for CI\CD. It's easier to read and it's easier to write them. It takes fewer clicks to achieve the same things with GitLab than it does for competitor products.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Very easy to integrate with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and with project/workflow management tools like JIRA.
  • Very efficient in managing security and compliance standards for code, especially during pull requests, merge requests, branching, etc.
  • Very robust in performance, especially the cloud and datacenter versions hardly hit any performance issues and supports more than 2000+ developers in my company.
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
  • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
  • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
  • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • The code management UI is a bit rough around the edges and difficult to work with.
  • BitBucket does not have the same simplified PR management tools as other competitors.
  • It's not as easy to integrate 3rd party apps as other competitors.
Read full review
GitLab
  • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
  • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
  • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
All products have room for improvement. The system improves over time with better and better integrations and I look forward to even more features without paying extra! The system has increased transparency across my organization and with this transparency comes increased throughput on projects. I don't think I can go back to any other system and we are definitely married to this product.
Read full review
GitLab
I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
The architecture of Bitbucket makes it more easily scalable than other source code management repositories. Also, administration and maintaining the instance is very easy. It integrates with JIRA and other CI/CD applications which makes it more useful to reduce the efforts. It supports multiple plugins and those bring a lot of extra functionality. It increases the overall efficiency and usefulness of Bitbucket.
Read full review
GitLab
I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
GitLab
GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
The customer support provided by Atlassian (Bitbucket's parent company that also makes Jira, Confluence, etc.) is very helpful. They seem to be very concerned about any issues reported with their products and even just questions about functionality. They are constantly improving the products with new features in nearly every release. Plus they have a plethora of online documentation to reference.
Read full review
GitLab
At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more familiar tool compared to GitLab. Bitbucket won out because of its close integration with Jira and being in the Atlassian family. It was also cheaper than GitHub. As we started with Jira, Bitbucket addition became a natural next step for us. We really liked Bitbucket and stayed with it but we do know we have great options in the form of GitHub and GitLab should we need to scale fast.
Read full review
GitLab
Gitlab seems more cutting-edge than GitHub; however, its AI tools are not yet as mature as those of CoPilot. It feels like the next-generation product, so as we selected a tool for our startup, we decided to invest in the disruptor in the space. While there are fewer out-of-the-box templates for Gitlab, we have never discovered a lack of feature parity.
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It's allowed for a lot of automation in terms of development workflows. It lets us pursue CI/CD approaches and get releases out faster
  • It has let us get our infrastructure configuration into VCS, which further improves our automation abilities.
  • It has aided in keeping track of changes, and allows us to keep workflows organized so we can track the status of development
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
  • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
  • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitLab Screenshots

Screenshot of GitLab, a comprehensive DevSecOps platform.Screenshot of Security DashboardScreenshot of Merge Request