Atlassian Bamboo vs. IBM DevOps Deploy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Bamboo
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Australian company Atlassian offers Bamboo, a continuous integration server.
$1,200
IBM DevOps Deploy
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
A solution for continuous delivery of any application to any environment, and an application-release solution that infuses automation into the continuous delivery and continuous deployment (CI/CD) process and provides robust visibility, traceability and auditing capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Editions & Modules
1 Remote Agent
$1200
5 Remote Agents
$3200
10 Remote Agents
$5840
25 Remote Agents
$11,600
100 Remote Agents
$23,280
250 Remote Agents
$58,160
500 Remote Agents
$87,280
1000 Remote Agents
$133,840
2000 Remote Agents
$187,380
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Best Alternatives
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian BambooIBM DevOps Deploy
Likelihood to Recommend
Large companies will find it particularly useful, but smaller companies and independent developers will not be able to afford the cost, and will not see many advantages compared to using an open source solution. However, having some software to handle continuous integration build servers as well as deployments, and doing this consistently between products, is absolutely essential.
Read full review
IBM UrbanCode Deploy is excellent for code deployments such as Java, .Net, C++, etc. It can also deploy and run SQLs reasonably well. Where it lacks is the ability for executables, Jars, WARs, EARs, etc.
Read full review
Pros
  • Continuous Deployment - you can use Bamboo to automatically build and deploy whenever there are changes in the source code.
  • Continuous Integration - by integrating the automated tests and the integration tests before deploying you make sure you know immediately if the latest code fits into the whole scheme of apps.
  • Integration with Jira and Bitbucket.
  • Flexibility with the program language used for builds: Maven, Ant, PowerShell, any command line tools.
Read full review
  • Consistently deploys to multiple environments with no changes to the process. Having reusable processes across environments from Dev to Production make deployments more consistent and easier to manage.
  • IBM UrbanCode Deploy has an easy to understand UI, to be able to review if a deployment has successfully completed or not, and details if it did not work. Using the UI is simple and easy to understand.
  • Scheduling and approvals are built-in as configured for the deployments. This allows us to use the same deployment process, but get approvals as needed when code is moved up to the upper environments.
Read full review
Cons
  • Extremely hard barrier to entry for non-backend developers
  • Blackbox makes it hard to customize functionality
  • The inability to add features without breaking core functionality
  • No cloud solution
  • Tasks cannot be put in if/else statements
  • No clear right way to form build plans
Read full review
  • Use of the internal API for public API use.
  • Less cryptic CLI output on commands.
  • Better use of custom variables that don't interfere with UCD's use.
Read full review
Usability
Bamboo offers solid usability for teams looking for an integrated, scalable CI/CD solution, especially those using Atlassian tools. Its interface is intuitive for existing Atlassian users, and its focus on deployment automation makes it a strong option for continuous delivery. However, its complexity and cost may pose challenges for small teams or those new to CI/CD. Overall, Bamboo’s usability shines in environments where ease of integration and streamlined workflows are prioritized. Still, it may require more effort for teams unfamiliar with its setup or without dedicated resources.
Read full review
It's challenging to get a working knowledge of the product without having someone show you the ropes. Linking components with applications and applications with resource trees and resource trees with application deploys is not intuitive. However, once past that learning curve, the possibilities open up, and things become easier to understand and allow for further granularity.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support for Bamboo has started lack a little over the years. Atlassian has been moving more towards Bitbucket Pipelines and away from the on-premise install of Bamboo. While the tool is still great, it may take a little bit of time to get a question answered by official support.
Read full review
I've not worked directly with IBM UrbanCode Deploy support. My DevOps team administers the environment and deals with that.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We chose Bamboo over Jenkins for 2 reasons - one, for its tight integration amongst all the products in the tool suite. We find explicit value in the traceability from JIRA issues all the way down to the Bamboo build that was triggered by the check in of those issues. The second reason was for support - we didn't want the burden of figuring out how to support Jenkins in our production environment, as can be the case with so many open source products.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Bamboo was neither very positive or negative. Most of our spend was in man hours on research and development
  • We felt it was worth it for larger projects
  • Smaller projects had too much setup and run and caused a negative ROI
Read full review
  • Push button deployments.
  • Consistency and ability to focus on other tasks.
  • Required quite a bit of upfront customization with certain web deployments (WebSphere, etc.)
  • Opened the door to other types of deployments and other automation.
Read full review
ScreenShots