For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
They have the same very similar capabilities. They have a quality measures icon and a great dashboard to help close gaps in care. Centricity does not have those features in this current version.
I was not the one that selected the program but we all voted as a group and the CEO made the decision. We actually voted to do more research because of the expense of the program.
It is easy to use and to learn with many available templates. We are in psychiatry and there were …
eCW allows for customization on the provider level whereas athenaClinicals requires standardization by specialty. Meaningful Use and other quality programs are more challenging on eCW. eCW templates are quite different looking from those that are in athenaClinicals and the flow …
Again, I would recommend Athena second on this list...and it's all practice specific. If a practice can afford Athena, then it's an ok system...but do not expect an intuitive system such as Cerner that can be fully customized and follows a physician workflow better.
athenahealth is more user friendly. There customer service center does not leave you without an answer. The reports can be built to each managers specific needs and the gathering of data from the EMR is fast. WOW!
NueMD
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose NueMD
AdvancedMD has really good customer service. Something NueMD needs to improve a lot. NueMD's pricing is GREAT, and we got a lot more features for a fraction of AdvancedMD. Software wise we only used AdvancedMD's Practice Management, and there is not a huge difference between …
NueMD is easier to use and more reliable than Allscripts. Allscripts feequently had technical problems when we eere using it.
It is more economical and a better value than Athena. It has the same features at a much lower price.
Overall NUEMD is easy to use self explanatory and realtime helps alot when were are busy checking in patients, it gives you messages letting you know when something isnt right and that makes the claim we send out to the ins company cleaner to the return on payments from the ins …
athenaClinicals is well suited from a single physician office to an enterprise healthcare system. The only specialty that they cannot cover is oncology that includes chemotherapy infusions (the dosing is very complicated and requires a specific oncology system).
We only use NueMD for scheduling and following up with patient, and entering their information... so I will just focus on that. The software does its job, has all the required fields you want for scheduling a patient and to keep their info at an easy access. I do think they need improvement in the Reports feature and the "Back" tool. Some of the reports are really good, some won't ever load and would make the program freeze and crash and some are not even possible to run cause you don't have the option for some filters.
Athena is able to create a medication list from the patient's pharmacy purchase history. This aides in compiling a comprehensive list quickly, especially when the patients do not know what meds they are on. The downside to this module is that every time that you add a medication that is not on the list, it turns it into an order that the provider needs to sign. There are many times that you need to make an addition, that the provider does not want to sign as an order.
The patient history module is easy to configure to meet the needs of the organization.
The billing software requires more work than is described when they are trying to sell you the program.
The sales staff that we dealt with had the vibe of car salesmen. At times very pushy and the room for negotiation grew at each interaction. The high cost first quoted is very negotiable but they "up charge" for many things.
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
WoundExpert was well suited to wound healing and hyperbaric medical practices. If athenaClinicals had the right forms and ability to accommodate wound care and HBO workflows, it would be a good competitor.
AdvancedMD has really good customer service. Something NueMD needs to improve a lot. NueMD's pricing is GREAT, and we got a lot more features for a fraction of AdvancedMD. Software wise we only used AdvancedMD's Practice Management, and there is not a huge difference between both software