Gravio vs. Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Gravio
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Gravio is an Edge Computing Platform that connects sensors and computer vision AI/ML. Gravio users can deploy the edge server called "Gravio HubKit" on their own macOS, Windows, or Linux hardware (including Raspberry Pi). Or they can use the "Gravio Hub", a set-top box that fully with LTE functionality, and the Gravio HubKit pre-installed. Gravio integrates with common standards, including HTTP…N/A
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms deliver secure, high-performance SD-WAN built for hybrid work, multicloud access, and 5G-ready networks. Powered by Cisco IOS XE, these devices combine flexible routing, SASE integration, and cloud-native agility to support AI-driven networking and edge computing needs.N/A
Pricing
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe free version does not include any hardware. The basic version can be ordered in the Mac and Windows App Store app. More advanced packages can be ordered via order form in the user portal.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Best Alternatives
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Scale Computing Platform
Scale Computing Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
Extreme Networks Wired Access - Switches
Extreme Networks Wired Access - Switches
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cisco Nexus Series Switches
Cisco Nexus Series Switches
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GravioCisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
With the flexibility of sizing options, the Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms has worked to deliver solutions for our various needs. Smaller systems offer strong connectivity for office developments. Mid-range options have served our larger campuses well. Our data center deployments of the larger systems have provided up to 100G connectivity and advanced routing solutions. The Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms continues to meet our needs and exceed our expectations.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Allows throughput reliable at over 200mb MPLS sites
  • Supplies reliable performance at mid-sized sites
  • Is much more quiet than an ISR4K
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Adding more NIM slots on motherboard
  • Adding PVDM slot for use cases where the router is used only for trans coding
  • Adding more granular tiers for DNA licensing. For example it is a big gap between 2000Mbps (400 Mbps agg) and 1Gbps (2 Gbps Agg)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Because I have had no issues with this product line and have grown go really trust in it. One of the besr thing is that this has had less vulnerabilities that the past cisco router that I have dealt with. In my line of work needing to upgrade code is always something that needs to be done after hours and most likely on weekends.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Either you deploy those routers as a standalone, or as part of the SD-WAN fabric, the amount of features and settings you can configure on them, is well beyond any other vendor or product on the market. While this may bring some configuration complexity, availability of support for variaty of different protocols and features allows you to solve almost any network challenge you may face
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have always had great response time and have never been let down by cisco support. I have had issues where the person who was assisting me was not able to provide a resolution but by utilizing his team members they where able to come together to provide a answer and resplve the situation.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
the licensing is messy
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Compared to the Cisco 2000 Series Connected GRID Routers, CGR2010, the Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms is more powerful in processing, and it has the capability to do the segment routing. It is easier to install physically and occupies less space in the rack, consumes less power, and saves more for the company.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Positive: It has a lot of options for the licensing level based on the scenario (SDWAN, IPSEC, Routing). There is no need for the DNA license for all the throughout for routing mode, like ISR4K models
  • Negative: There is a gap between the 200Mbps tier licence and 1Gbps tier. If a custumer needs a 500Mbps licence (1G AGG), we need to offer a doubled value
  • Positive: The platform can be used for routing mode and can be migrated to SDWAN using the same hardware.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Gravio Screenshots

Screenshot of Data Management to organise Areas and Data LayersScreenshot of Create your own actions from an ever-growing number of action components; use the shell script component to execute any shell script based on sensor data.Screenshot of HTTP example component where you can send sensor data and values to a Rest/API endpointScreenshot of Trigger configuration to determine under which conditions an action should be executed; in this example, we use a camera feed and TensorFlow people counting model to trigger an action if more than 10 people are detected.