Asset Panda vs. Snow Atlas

Asset Panda, in my opinion, is well suited for even the most confined environments. The software's costing is very viable and well worth the value that it brings to solving a variety of keeping inventory that many businesses face. This item has saved us money by keeping track of assets that would have otherwise been lost or written off. This all is now in its proper place.

Incentivized

It is well suited as a SaaS solution which reduces our internal infrastructure and support costs

Incentivized

• It is great for a non profit organization because you can add any columns you need to the asset. For example, I have added a funding source column to sort different grants that have paid for our assets.
• Asset Panda provides the depreciation calculation for you.
• The software is easy to maneuver. It can be easily searched and sorted by type of asset/date or any category you create.
• You can add and track non depreciable items as well. Reports can be ran for just depreciable assets when needed so this will not interfere with you depreciable asset listing.

Incentivized

• Visibility of Applications, User, devices in your estate
• License compliance reports
• SaaS Usage Visibility
• Shadow IT Visibility

Incentivized

• Sometimes search isn't the best
• It does not tell you if you have double posted

Incentivized

• Dashboard reporting so we gain insights over time
• The ability to add both desktop and cloud applications not in Snows database directly
• Alert Snow when the application type needs correcting
• Ability to add new periods and rates for M365 and still have previous periods
• Ability to log calls to Snow via Snow Atlas

Provides the much needed visibility to contain spend and rationalise software

Atlas is easy to navigate, it looks reasonably similar to the on prem version we were using previously

Incentivized

Front line support staff done always understand the issue you are explaining or the need to escalate to back end/higher up areas for resolutions and can often require use of the Escalate function or emailing to your Account/Customer Success Manager. That said, once an issue properly is understood, it is handled well.

Incentivized

We should have spun up a Project to manage the implementation. Snow indicated to us the ease in which Snow Atlas could be implemented, however this did not factor in that we were migrating from their on-prem product Snow License Manager hosted through a Managed Servicer Partner. For a clean installation, your implementation can be quick and likely not require a Project. If you are migrating from another products or are a company that can have lots of stakeholders, fingers in the pie, hurdles/business processes that need to be adhered to, definitely use a Project to perform your implementation.

Incentivized

I have not used any other tracking programs, so I do not have an opinion either way

Incentivized

This is my 1st software license tool that I've used.

Incentivized

• Inventory now has RBAC.
• Inventory is easily kept up to date with annual verification buttons.
• Inventory can now use labels and gun scanners for easy reconciliation.
• Inventory can be searched using any field.

Incentivized

• Rationalising renewal numbers down to only what you need, factoring in people who request software and hardly/never use it
• Tracking Named User license assignments

Incentivized