TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AspenONE Engineering vs. geoSCOUT

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AspenONE Engineering

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AAspen Technology headquartered in Bedford offers AspenONE Engineering to refineries as a software design aid, emphasizing process optimization and cost control.N/A

    geoSCOUT

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/AgeoSCOUT geological data analysis platform comes with preloaded data and can analyze geological data from other sources, from geoLOGIC systems in Calgary.N/A
    Pricing
    AspenONE EngineeringgeoSCOUT
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AspenONE EngineeringgeoSCOUT
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    AspenONE EngineeringgeoSCOUT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.9
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AspenONE EngineeringgeoSCOUT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Aspen Technology
    In enterprises where another project is tailored to the needs of the client rather than using basic tools. And where the estimate requires comprehensive cost buckets for production operations. When there is a large amount of purchasing history to enter into AspenONE Engineering in order for it to provide reliable projections. Standard equipment manufacturing enterprises are not well suited. Also, because this instrument requires time, when there are time limitation and resource or human limitations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    There are really only 2 tools in industry that have the function of geoSCOUT (the other being Accumap.) Both are similar. I'd recommend geoSCOUT for project/area specific work. I'd recommend Accumap for start-up companies who are trying to establish their 'playground' as it's easier to navigate province wide assets, whereas new maps are required for geoSCOUT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Aspen Technology
    • Once an estimate is made, it can be simply copied and modified for another similar equipment estimate
    • ACCE can be customized per the company's requirements
    • Templates for each equipment style can be made and can be used repeatedly
    • Very detailed reporting, of each cost segment like steel, electrical, civil, instruments is available for analysis
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    • Well ticket information.
    • Spatial analysis.
    • Query effectiveness.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Aspen Technology
    • The User Guide is far too large to browse and learn from.
    • Documentation is detailed while also being complicated.
    • Any modifications that need to be made will take a long time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    • Cross sections are not always that visually appealing. Cross sections from Petrel look much better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Aspen Technology
    We began assessing several tools when we began estimating for a full process plant or various styles of equipment. We also investigated implementing an ERP system used by the sales and item engineering departments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Aspen Technology
    The support team is always available for help. They are agile and cheerful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Aspen Technology
    Again answering from the ACCE perspective (Estimating tool) - Previously when we did estimates for simple equipment we had used excel estimates and lotus reporting. However, as we started estimating for an entire process plant or various style of equipment, we had started evaluating various tools. We had also considered using an ERP system that is utilized by Purchasing and Product Engineering teams, however, ACCE seemed a better fit for the amount of detailed estimating needed. And the robustness and various options available made us select this tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    Accumap is also a similar tool. The two tools contain the same information, although geoSCOUT has extra modules which have been somewhat useful. For the most part, engineers pull raw production, completions and facilities data. geoSCOUT is better for visualizing plans and allowing toggling of different considerations using the layer manager.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Aspen Technology
    • Investment apart from the cost of tool, is time - It is very time taking to obtain the results required
    • We are being trained by a professional consultant on ACCE, and yet to see the ROI
    • Detailed estimates as needed by Product Engineering is a plus
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    geoLOGIC systems
    • Allowed for efficient information gathering thereby decreasing turnaround time on projects.
    • Helpful for competitor analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots