Aspect Unified IP vs. Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aspect Unified IP
Score 3.7 out of 10
N/A
Aspect Software headquartered in Massachusetts offers Aspect Unified UP, a call center solution for enterprise contact centers. It supports an omnichannel customer experience across voice, email, chat, SMS, IM, and social channels.N/A
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Genesys PureConnect was an omnichannel contact center platform that offered cloud-based or on-premise deployments. It featured a SIP-based architecture with VoIP capabilities, allowing companies to connect legacy voice systems and use existing phones. A legacy product, new users are encouraged to investigate Genesys Cloud.N/A
Pricing
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Features
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Aspect Unified IP
7.4
Ratings
11% below category average
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
7.9
Ratings
5% below category average
Agent dashboard7.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Validate callers9.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Outbound response8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Call forwarding6.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)9.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Warm transfer8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Predictive dialing9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Interactive voice response5.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
REST APIs8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Call scripts4.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Call tracking6.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Multichannel integration8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
CRM software integration8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Aspect Unified IP
8.5
Ratings
3% above category average
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
5.5
Ratings
40% below category average
Inbound call routing9.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing8.10 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Recording9.60 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Quality management9.10 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Call analytics8.60 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Historical reporting7.40 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Live reporting7.40 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Customer surveys8.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics9.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aspect Unified IPGenesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
The system is very complicated for the initial installations in the servers, which
requires highly qualified personnel for the start-up. It cost me the installation at the beginning but I knew it would be worth it because the use of an administrative control of calls is important and more when you have many service providers.
Read full review
CIC is best suited for business models that rely on heavily leverage Data Integration especially one like ours that require real-time and high-speed data access for billing and customer integration. CIC is not well suited for small organizations < 50 where they are only answering phones in the course of doing business VS. the business is the phone.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integrates inbound and outbound call routing in one platform, allowing agents to work in a seamless blend mode between all call types (inbound, predictive, manual).
  • Allows you to associate an account number with every agent phone call, the call type, and the reccording ID giving you the critical datapoints necessary to research, put together a customers experience from a telephony perspective, etc.
  • Create agent templates to streamline agent setup reducing the potential for admins to configure an agent incorrectly, placing them in services they aren't skilled for and vice versa.
Read full review
  • Purely Software Based System: On Microsoft OS. It is an all software-based system making it easy to manage, integrate and interface with other systems
  • One Vendor: All modules, IVR, ACD, Dialer, WFM are from one vendor. So, no compatibility and latency issues at all.
  • Superb Notifier Service: You don't have to restart any process or service for a change to take effect.
Read full review
Cons
  • The reports are very basic.
  • There may be a broader reporting line, perhaps with more detailed records.
Read full review
  • Licensing can be challenging and very expensive.
  • Client templates are hard to administer and are built very different than the rest of the functionality.
  • Web desktop has been slow to come along and include all the features.
  • Optimizer is very sub-par product.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Aspect Unified IP is very competent to handle most customers' needs in the contact center and it delivers what is promised. The only negative aspect is the costs of services, maintenance and professional services, too expensive.
Read full review
We are so embedded on Pure Connect that we like to progress with it. For instance, we are looking into ways to provide different solutions to our customers, help our business to succeed, and work in a better CX.
One of the biggest advantages is that all is in one platform.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The interface is only semi user-friendly on almost every front. Agent experience is lacking and we have found many limitations within the system. Workforce forecasting is not as robust as expected. Quality continues to be a struggle. Interaction searches are not robust.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
The application itself uses a hub and spoke model that can help isolate errors in one section of the application from the rest, creating a much more stable overall program. Of all of the outages that we've had with our contact center platform, I can count on one hand how often it was truly a Genesys issue rather than a network issue, server issue or issue with a platform relied upon for an integration (web services, db calls).
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Some of the client applications take a bit of time on initial load, but with the move towards web based applications that issue is alleviated. You can tell that effort really isn't putting into the desktop apps any longer and that the client development effort is being put into bringing Interaction Connect closer to feature parity with the desktop (and bringing wholly new features to Connect). As far as IVR operations, web service calls, database operations: they all operate reasonably.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
This really depends if/who your Vendor is or if you purchase directly from Genesys. I would say that whenever I deal with Genesys directly they've always been able to answer my questions and find a resolution to my issues. Unfortunately being on an older version means that answer is usually that you need to spend money to upgrade or move to the cloud
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I liked the setup of the whole class. The instructor knew the topic well enough to answer questions from entry level to a more advanced one.
Instructor encouraged participation of the whole class and was able to engage every one. Also provided "real live" examples so everyone can relate to it.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The online training itself is good. You are provided resources and can self study to a certain point, but the pacing always felt off. Either snails pace or like trying to drink from a fire hose. I think this easily could have had to do with course material and my personal preparations, though. I would say my main gripe is that since the acquisition the team responsible for actually booking training is very unresponsive and often not knowledgeable about the courses they offer. Booking my last training was a real chore.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Don't try to go the perfect solution as a first target. Work on answer the more needs with a simple solution. Then analyse and try again to answer the most needs with adding a bit if complexity only if require. No needs to customise straight from the beginning or deployment takes too long.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have not spent any time recently doing a detailed analysis of other vendors to comfortably answer this question. I will say that the last time I checked, the ability to have all 3 call types (inbound,outbound,and manual) managed in one convenient seamless platform was not available which is very important to me.
Read full review
Call Manager, you had to buy all the components that are out of the box for PureConnect. The licensing model is more expensive on the Cisco side vs the Genesys PureConnect side. Lastly was on the Cisco side since you have to connect/integrate all the components on the cisco side you have to have so many vendors to install those parts. This drives the cost up even more so it was not worth going that route for our organization.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Genesys PureConnect's core and adjunct model allows for fairly easy growth in satellite locations via off site session managers, remote located media servers, remote content servers, etc to allow you to spread the infrastructure out while not pushing as much network traffic to your core data centers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Aspect Unified IP has been a great investment for us, and we have been their customers for 10 years now
  • Aspect is important for us in delivering WOW experiences for our customers
Read full review
  • We're improving our CX by optimizing our call centers, using additional attributes and keys to identify the best rep for the job.
  • We are also streamlining the journey of each individual customer by using PureConnect as the central interface for omnichannel interactions, allowing us to pick up the conversation where we left off.
  • Using additional attributes that start with the contact center interaction, we're able to track a student journey and proactively step in - increasing our individualized support to focus on the student outcome.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Genesys PureConnect (discontinued) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of