Arcserve Cloud Services vs. Azure Site Recovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcserve Cloud Services
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
StorageCraft, an Arcserve company since the March 2021 merger, offers their StorageCraft Cloud Backup service as cloud-based backup contingency for data stored in cloud-based applications.N/A
Azure Site Recovery
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS) available Microsoft's Azure, and enables users to set up Azure Site Recovery simply by replicating an Azure VM to a different Azure region directly from the Azure portal. Site Recovery is automatically updated with new Azure features as they’re released. Minimize recovery issues by sequencing the order of multi-tier applications running on multiple virtual machines. Users can ensure compliance by testing their disaster…N/A
Pricing
Arcserve Cloud ServicesAzure Site Recovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcserve Cloud ServicesAzure Site Recovery
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcserve Cloud ServicesAzure Site Recovery
User Ratings
Arcserve Cloud ServicesAzure Site Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arcserve Cloud ServicesAzure Site Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
StorageCraft is the best, in my opinion, when it comes to back up servers with bare metal images. The image manager for sending those files to the cloud is also great. I would have to say the file and folder option,(formally gilware) still needs work. It's just not as reliable or easy to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Easy file and folder backup and restoring.
  • Easy file and folder restoring with versioning.
  • StorageCraft has great tools that allow you to spin up virtual machines from bare metal backups.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Reporting is not white-labelled and its design has room for improvement
  • No automatic/scheduled virtual boot tests
  • Customization is very limited
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Before migrating to StorageCraft Cloud Backup, we used ShadowProtect for our organization and for our clients' backups. StorageCraft Cloud Backup is a strong and reliable product that has certainly been delivered when needed. However, moving to StorageCraft Cloud Backup has substantially reduced our workload provided it integrates StorageCraft Cloud Backup, Image Manager, and ShadowControl in one single portal which is easy to understand and manage even by level 1 engineers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Reduced manual workload on managing backups by 50% compared to ShadowProtect and Image Manager
  • Increased profitability as its price is very competitive
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots