ARCON PAM vs. Delinea Privilege Manager

Best thing I like is the user access management. You can assign different users the different roles, so systems on the ARCONs become more secure. It comes with real-time threat detection which means we don't have to sit and watch every user's activity - ARCON does that for us. And we can use the recording feature if we diagnose any vicious behavior.

Incentivized

The more endpoints I managed with Delinea Privilege Manager, the less reliable it became. When initially pilot testing the platform with just a small number of PCs, it worked reliably, but as we added more and more endpoints it became very inconsistent as to how accurately endpoints would receive updated rules and configs.

Incentivized

• Real-time threat detection.
• Manage user roles and access.
• Records of user activities.
• With one login can access multiple servers.

Incentivized

• Custom Rule Creation

Incentivized

• After a network failure it is very difficult to log into the system.
• GUI is bit slow.
• Improve the documentation to get more knowledge about easily using GUI.

Incentivized

• Endpoint Client
• Server Reliability/Consistency

Incentivized

There were too many times over the years where something would be setup properly, but still not work correctly. Even after Delinea support would work on it, they still couldn't get it to work. Often times the solution involved me digging through source files or XML config files and editing them manually to get certain things to work and then passing the solution on to their support.

Incentivized

CyberArk's solution is about on par with Delinea's. We currently are using a lesser known product called AutoElevate by CyberFox. It is easier to manage on the backend and more reliable.

Incentivized

• We have been able to prove the security of our products to the customers.
• Ability to provide different privilege levels to the different users.
• Time saver.

Incentivized

• Lower Call Volume to Helpdesk

Incentivized