Aptean Made2Manage ERP is an enterprise resource planning software solution. It is built specifically for small and mid-sized manufacturers. It includes dynamic, to-order environments such as make-to-order, engineer-to-order, assemble-to-order, and mixed mode operations.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Features
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
Ratings
151% below category average
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Pay calculation
1.00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
1.00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
API for custom integration
1.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.5
Ratings
80% below category average
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability
5.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
2.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.7
Ratings
91% below category average
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Dashboards
2.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standard reports
3.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Custom reports
3.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
4.9
Ratings
45% below category average
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
5.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
5.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
Ratings
126% below category average
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Inventory tracking
1.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Location management
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
Ratings
92% below category average
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Pricing
4.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order entry
4.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Credit card processing
2.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
4.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Order Orchestration
2.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
5.3
Ratings
34% below category average
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Billing Management
6.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
5.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Period Close
7.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.3
Ratings
79% below category average
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Project Costing
3.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
3.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
3.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
4.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
3.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
Ratings
117% below category average
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
62% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
1.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.3
Ratings
106% below category average
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
1.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
Ratings
82% below category average
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Supplier Management
1.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
Ratings
86% below category average
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Risk Repository
3.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Control Management
4.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
3.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Issue Detection
1.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.4
Ratings
65% below category average
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
5.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
5.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
3.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
Ratings
96% below category average
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Production Process Design
2.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Production Management
4.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
2.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Work Execution
3.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Forecasting
1.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
It is good in manufacturing. It helps with planning and scheduling. Also, employees can clock on and off jobs simply to see what each job actually entails in regards to time, quantity and dollars. Shipping and receiving also utilize multiple functions inside of M2M heavily. I think it is less suited for anything outside of manufacturing.
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Their support has drastically gone downhill over the last few years. For the amount of money paid for the support of their product, there should be no outsourced tech support, however, they have started doing that lately.
The development team has no idea how to test a product or release patches in an effective manner. Our last major upgrade was not until the 12th revision of the software and there were still major flaws on the financial end. When I called them about it, they stated that they knew of the issue but had no plans for a fix until the next version release.
There has been more than one occasion where I have informed them of a way to resolve an issue that should've already know about.
I am not in the decision making group any more for this product. When I was, I along with many other managers, voted to go with a competitive product software vs re-subscribing to Aptean for this product. We were convinced by certain parties at our work that the new product was head and shoulders above the old product. While they freshened up a few things and there was an increase in some functionality areas, it was still tired.
This software is not user-friendly nor easy to train on. I train people for various departments and had argued for the company to go with another company. I was not alone. When the time came for us to do an upgrade (necessitated by the advent of Windows 10 compatibility issues), a number of managers at our organization wanted to seek out other vendors due to the difficulty in training people to use the software. Then have to deal with so many of the user issues and lack of functionality created by the need for using an outside software programmer to bring in software that interpreted what M2M was doing and then translate it back into the program so that we had an end-user solution. This software should be robust enough to do it all. It is not. I hate to be so negative about it but anyone that has spent as many years using this software as I have should find something good to say about the platform and I struggle to do that. I had asked for the warranty section that would tie into the return authorization process. I was told it would happen. It didn't. Bad karma.
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
I go back to the warranty segment of the program to help track expenses that were generated by returns and zero-dollar sales orders to resolve customer issues. I feel like I was lied to by the company. They said they would have it in there on the new release. They told the purchasing manager it would be on the new release. The purchasing manager assured me it would be on there. They even showed 'warranty loading' on the screen when you signed in. However, there was no additional component of the return material authorization process for warranty adaptation. I even challenged our upload team about it and they had no answer. It does a few functions well but in my personal experience, buy something else.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
The actual implementation was no worse or better than other software updates. There were days of pain and additional training helped overcome a lot of the learning curve associated with that. However, that training came from our own internal staff vs anyone from Aptean.
We haven't compared any yet but hopefully, we will in the next couple years so we can put a figure on what it will cost us to move away from Made2Manage.
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
I came on board after M2M was implemented so I'm not sure how it has changed from previous software. However, I do know it has the ability to grow with the company.