Aptean Made2Manage ERP is an enterprise resource planning software solution. It is built specifically for small and mid-sized manufacturers. It includes dynamic, to-order environments such as make-to-order, engineer-to-order, assemble-to-order, and mixed mode operations.
N/A
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
Pricing
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Ridder iQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Ridder iQ
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Ridder iQ
Features
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Ridder iQ
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
Ratings
151% below category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
1.00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.5
Ratings
80% below category average
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
Single sign-on capability
5.00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
2.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.7
Ratings
91% below category average
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Dashboards
2.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standard reports
3.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom reports
3.00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
4.9
Ratings
45% below category average
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
Accounts payable
6.00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
5.00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
5.00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
Ratings
126% below category average
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking
1.00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Location management
2.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
Ratings
92% below category average
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing
4.00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Order entry
4.00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Credit card processing
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
4.00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Order Orchestration
2.00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
5.3
Ratings
34% below category average
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Billing Management
6.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
5.00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.00 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Period Close
7.00 Ratings
5.60 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.3
Ratings
79% below category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
Ratings
117% below category average
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
1.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
5.40 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.3
Ratings
105% below category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
Ratings
82% below category average
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.00 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management
1.00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
4.20 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
Ratings
86% below category average
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
3.00 Ratings
4.50 Ratings
Control Management
4.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
3.00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection
1.00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.4
Ratings
65% below category average
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
5.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
Ratings
96% below category average
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Production Process Design
2.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Production Management
4.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Configuration Management
2.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Work Execution
3.00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Forecasting
1.00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
2.00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
It is good in manufacturing. It helps with planning and scheduling. Also, employees can clock on and off jobs simply to see what each job actually entails in regards to time, quantity and dollars. Shipping and receiving also utilize multiple functions inside of M2M heavily. I think it is less suited for anything outside of manufacturing.
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Their support has drastically gone downhill over the last few years. For the amount of money paid for the support of their product, there should be no outsourced tech support, however, they have started doing that lately.
The development team has no idea how to test a product or release patches in an effective manner. Our last major upgrade was not until the 12th revision of the software and there were still major flaws on the financial end. When I called them about it, they stated that they knew of the issue but had no plans for a fix until the next version release.
There has been more than one occasion where I have informed them of a way to resolve an issue that should've already know about.
The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
I am not in the decision making group any more for this product. When I was, I along with many other managers, voted to go with a competitive product software vs re-subscribing to Aptean for this product. We were convinced by certain parties at our work that the new product was head and shoulders above the old product. While they freshened up a few things and there was an increase in some functionality areas, it was still tired.
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
This software is not user-friendly nor easy to train on. I train people for various departments and had argued for the company to go with another company. I was not alone. When the time came for us to do an upgrade (necessitated by the advent of Windows 10 compatibility issues), a number of managers at our organization wanted to seek out other vendors due to the difficulty in training people to use the software. Then have to deal with so many of the user issues and lack of functionality created by the need for using an outside software programmer to bring in software that interpreted what M2M was doing and then translate it back into the program so that we had an end-user solution. This software should be robust enough to do it all. It is not. I hate to be so negative about it but anyone that has spent as many years using this software as I have should find something good to say about the platform and I struggle to do that. I had asked for the warranty section that would tie into the return authorization process. I was told it would happen. It didn't. Bad karma.
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
I go back to the warranty segment of the program to help track expenses that were generated by returns and zero-dollar sales orders to resolve customer issues. I feel like I was lied to by the company. They said they would have it in there on the new release. They told the purchasing manager it would be on the new release. The purchasing manager assured me it would be on there. They even showed 'warranty loading' on the screen when you signed in. However, there was no additional component of the return material authorization process for warranty adaptation. I even challenged our upload team about it and they had no answer. It does a few functions well but in my personal experience, buy something else.
The actual implementation was no worse or better than other software updates. There were days of pain and additional training helped overcome a lot of the learning curve associated with that. However, that training came from our own internal staff vs anyone from Aptean.
We haven't compared any yet but hopefully, we will in the next couple years so we can put a figure on what it will cost us to move away from Made2Manage.
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
I came on board after M2M was implemented so I'm not sure how it has changed from previous software. However, I do know it has the ability to grow with the company.