Appium vs. Testlum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appium
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Testlum
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Testlum is a low-code testing tool with an XML-based structure designed to provide ease of use and efficiency for QA specialists.N/A
Pricing
AppiumTestlum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppiumTestlum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppiumTestlum
Features
AppiumTestlum
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
Appium
-
Ratings
Testlum
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Parallel Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Real Device Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppiumTestlum
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppiumTestlum
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppiumTestlum
Likelihood to Recommend
Appium works well for well-structured mobile applications test automation that is particularly easy to leverage when different pages of the app use similar building blocks. If it takes time for some content in the app to be rendered, ask your dev team to add progress indicators and ensure they are accessible. That might be more complicated to do with Appium, though, if there's no good contact with Dev team established so you can request accessibility IDs added quickly enough when needed. Appium supports another locator strategies as well though (such as xPath or iOS class chain on iOS) but they wouldn't work as fast so you may get really slow tests.
Read full review
Testlum has a low code, which is why we chose this tool. We freed up our testers' time for more complex tasks and increased efficiency as a result.
Read full review
Pros
  • Crossdevice: With Appium you can automate tests for Android and iOS both. There is no need to learn more than 1 language.
  • Easy: It's really easy to configure and use appium; it's very useful when you're testing strategy is based on "developers write tests".
  • Open Source: It's such a nice strength of appium, because you don't need to pay to use a good tool like Appium is.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • There are a number of expected methods that are not implemented, yet. With a similar sounding name as Selenium with similar functions, people who are familiar with Selenium try to use methods that appear to be available, but give a "not yet implemented" exception when run.
  • Documentation can be confusing.
  • Setup was a difficult process. This may not necessarily be the case once you figure everything out, but the whole figuring it out process was difficult and I ran into many, many problems when I first started.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
Read full review
We did not find any disadvantages in using Testlum and were completely satisfied
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Most of mobile testing tools which are available in the market are paid license tools. But Appium is Open source mobile testing tool. We can create customised automation framework using Appium. It also supports various languages such as Java, Javascript etc. And also supports various operating systems such as Android, IOS etc. We can easily integrate Appium frameworks with CI/CD [Jenkins, Git etc].
Read full review
We chose Testlum over other testing tools for several reasons. Unlike some competitors, it is low-code. All our testers are manual QA engineers, and we needed an easy-to-start automated solution. The second reason is that we wanted a centralized tool to avoid switching between different products. Compared to other tools, Testlum excels in its ease of integration. Plus, its team support and documentation make troubleshooting and learning new features easy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • For cost of ownership, the increase is positive times infinity, as it's free to install and use
  • Lead time for suite development can be a negative, if not planned for during sprint planning
  • Using Appium to execute tests in parallel across a cloud solution can improve CI/CD cycles by 100's of a percent
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots