Appian vs. Microsoft Copilot Studio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appian
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
Microsoft Copilot Studio
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Copilot Studio is a low-code tool that empowers users to build their copilots or customize Microsoft Copilot. With its conversational capabilities, including custom GPTs, generative AI plugins, and manual topics, Copilot Studio is a platform that can be adapted to suit a range of use cases. Microsoft Copilot Studio provides an end-to-end lifecycle for standalone copilots and customizations through a single web-based experience. This allows users to build, deploy,…N/A
Pricing
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
Minimum 100, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
Unlimited
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor building a copilot: $200 per month/tenant for 25,000 messages. Additional packs available. For customizing Copilot for Microsoft 365: Copilot Studio is included in the $30 user license.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Features
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Appian
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Copilot Studio
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Jasper
Jasper
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM watsonx Orchestrate
IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM watsonx Orchestrate
IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppianMicrosoft Copilot Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
Appian is well suited for the areas which involve a workflow. For Example: Consider there is a task and 3 teams are required to work on the task, with Appian we can create tasks for each team and monitor the comments and completion. Together with the integration capabilities, this tool can function in many areas. In our firm, we are using it to automate the workflows for our business teams and help them in capturing the OLA's and SLA's.
Read full review
Where you have a very finite and specific use case, that matches well with the intended use case of the product, it tends to be a great fit. For example we created a plain language chatbot which can rewrite any given piece of text into plain language, referring to specific internal standards.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
  • Agentic workflows
  • AI chatbots
  • Deploying via Teams
  • Multiple knowledge sources
Read full review
Cons
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
  • Ability to combine multiple sources in one query (indexing)
  • SharePoint integration - word count limit detrimental
  • Clearer communication and understanding of features and limitations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There are many differences between using Appian and using other programming languages. Additionally, there are many trade offs that have to be made and that have to be accepted for using Appian. In some cases, you give up control of one small area, but in others, it may open settings that are unavailable to a developer when using other program languages.
Read full review
Microsoft Copilot Studio is very easy to design new chatbot agents and deploy them to users, it revolutionises the ability to develop and deploy these types of solutions at scale. It does something similar to Power Automate - where it is a low/no code solution that enables tech capabilities not easily possible prior.
Read full review
Support Rating
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex process flows and has the ability to discover new opportunities for automation.
Read full review
Really there is no other solution for enterprises than Microsoft Copilot Studio, as every business in New Zealand is already using MS licensing and backend infrastructure. This addition is game changing for those who otherwise would be locked out of solutions that would require new licensing structures to enable these capabilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our IT automated procurement process has sped up time to get paid by a few days on every transaction
  • Our approvals are more organized as a result of being put in digitally
  • Managing our own tenant requires more than we have available, given the quarterly updates
  • Since we have business-critical functions running in the platform, we have to thoroughly review every note of every update. Because of this we skip half of the updates since we don't have enough time to review these changes four times a year.
Read full review
  • Speed of delivery
  • Scale of deployment
  • Increase of access
Read full review
ScreenShots

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism

Microsoft Copilot Studio Screenshots

Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - WorkflowScreenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - ChatScreenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - Conversational AIScreenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - ActionsScreenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - AnalyticsScreenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio - Conversation