TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Solr

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AApache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A

    MongoDB

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.

    $0.10

    million reads

    Pricing
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Shared
    $0
    per month
    Serverless
    $0.10million reads
    million reads
    Dedicated
    $57
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Apache Solr
    Some people on my team tried MondoDB and had several problems (don't remember which ones).

    Elasticsearch would be a good choice but we didn't have it in our minds when we made the choice.
    Incentivized
    MongoDB
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Apache Solr and MongoDB
    Feature
    Apache Solr
    -
    Ratings
    MongoDB
    10.0
    39 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Performance00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings10.039 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings10.038 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Small Businesses
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Algolia
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Algolia
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    10.0
    (79 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (67 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (13 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache SolrMongoDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Solr spins up nicely and works effectively for small enterprise environments providing helpful mechanisms for fuzzy searches and facetted searching. For larger enterprises with complex business solutions you'll find the need to hire an expert Solr engineer to optimize the powerful platform to your needs. Internationalization is tricky with Solr and many hosting solutions may limit you to a latin character set.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    If asked by a colleague I would highly recommend MongoDB. MongoDB provides incredible flexibility and is quick and easy to set up. It also provides extensive documentation which is very useful for someone new to the tool. Though I've used it for years and still referenced the docs often. From my experience and the use cases I've worked on, I'd suggest using it anywhere that needs a fast, efficient storage space for non-relational data. If a relational database is needed then another tool would be more apt.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Easy to get started with Apache Solr. Whether it is tackling a setup issue or trying to learn some of the more advanced features, there are plenty of resources to help you out and get you going.
    • Performance. Apache Solr allows for a lot of custom tuning (if needed) and provides great out of the box performance for searching on large data sets.
    • Maintenance. After setting up Solr in a production environment there are plenty of tools provided to help you maintain and update your application. Apache Solr comes with great fault tolerance built in and has proven to be very reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Being a JSON language optimizes the response time of a query, you can directly build a query logic from the same service
    • You can install a local, database-based environment rather than the non-relational real-time bases such a firebase does not allow, the local environment is paramount since you can work without relying on the internet.
    • Forming collections in Mango is relatively simple, you do not need to know of query to work with it, since it has a simple graphic environment that allows you to manage databases for those who are not experts in console management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • These examples are due to the way we use Apache Solr. I think we have had the same problems with other NoSQL databases (but perhaps not the same solution). High data volumes of data and a lot of users were the causes.
    • We have lot of classifications and lot of data for each classification. This gave us several problems:
    • First: We couldn't keep all our data in Solr. Then we have all data in our MySQL DB and searching data in Solr. So we need to be sure to update and match the 2 databases in the same time.
    • Second: We needed several load balanced Solr databases.
    • Third: We needed to update all the databases and keep old data status.
    • If I don't speak about problems due to our lack of experience, the main Solr problem came from frequency of updates vs validation of several database. We encountered several locks due to this (our ops team didn't want to use real clustering, so all DB weren't updated). Problem messages were not always clear and we several days to understand the problems.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • An aggregate pipeline can be a bit overwhelming as a newcomer.
    • There's still no real concept of joins with references/foreign keys, although the aggregate framework has a feature that is close.
    • Database management/dev ops can still be time-consuming if rolling your own deployments. (Thankfully there are plenty of providers like Compose or even MongoDB's own Atlas that helps take care of the nitty-gritty.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    I am looking forward to increasing our SaaS subscriptions such that I get to experience global replica sets, working in reads from secondaries, and what not. Can't wait to be able to exploit some of the power that the "Big Boys" use MongoDB for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    NoSQL database systems such as MongoDB lack graphical interfaces by default and therefore to improve usability it is necessary to install third-party applications to see more visually the schemas and stored documents. In addition, these tools also allow us to visualize the commands to be executed for each operation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    Finding support from local companies can be difficult. There were times when the local company could not find a solution and we reached a solution by getting support globally. If a good local company is found, it will overcome all your problems with its global support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    While the setup and configuration of MongoDB is pretty straight forward, having a vendor that performs automatic backups and scales the cluster automatically is very convenient. If you do not have a system administrator or DBA familiar with MongoDB on hand, it's a very good idea to use a 3rd party vendor that specializes in MongoDB hosting. The value is very well worth it over hosting it yourself since the cost is often reasonable among providers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    We tried to use both Elasticsearch and Swiftype with Drupal 8 but there are currently no good modules that integrate Drupal with those solutions. So Solr was really the only option for a Drupal 8 web site. It's not as easy to learn or use as Swiftype, but in the end I think it will be a little less expensive and offer more customization and flexibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    We have [measured] the speed in reading/write operations in high load and finally select the winner = MongoDBWe have [not] too much data but in case there will be 10 [times] more we need Cassandra. Cassandra's storage engine provides constant-time writes no matter how big your data set grows. For analytics, MongoDB provides a custom map/reduce implementation; Cassandra provides native Hadoop support.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • It has enabled my organization to find information faster by being a one-stop service to search across content that were indexed from varying sources.
    • By using synonyms and usual lemmatizations / stemming, it enabled discovery of new content following every search.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Open Source w/ reasonable support costs have a direct, positive impact on the ROI (we moved away from large, monolithic, locked in licensing models)
    • You do have to balance the necessary level of HA & DR with the number of servers required to scale up and scale out. Servers cost money - so DR & HR doesn't come for free (even though it's built into the architecture of MongoDB
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    MongoDB Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot