Apache Solr vs. IBM Watson Content Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Solr
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Apache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A
IBM Watson Content Analytics
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Content Analytics is an enterprise search option. This supersedes IBM's older offerings, IBM Omnifind and IBM Content Analytics and Enterprise Search.N/A
Pricing
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Best Alternatives
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.4 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.4 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Solr spins up nicely and works effectively for small enterprise environments providing helpful mechanisms for fuzzy searches and facetted searching. For larger enterprises with complex business solutions you'll find the need to hire an expert Solr engineer to optimize the powerful platform to your needs. Internationalization is tricky with Solr and many hosting solutions may limit you to a latin character set.
Read full review
IBM
If one is looking for a content crawling search engine (think "Google" but on your own private system), IBM Watson does a great job. It is also very good for locating duplicate files/folders and lost items. If document organization and searching is the goal, IBM Watson hits the nail on the head.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Easy to get started with Apache Solr. Whether it is tackling a setup issue or trying to learn some of the more advanced features, there are plenty of resources to help you out and get you going.
  • Performance. Apache Solr allows for a lot of custom tuning (if needed) and provides great out of the box performance for searching on large data sets.
  • Maintenance. After setting up Solr in a production environment there are plenty of tools provided to help you maintain and update your application. Apache Solr comes with great fault tolerance built in and has proven to be very reliable.
Read full review
IBM
  • Easy Interface - Drag and click based UI.
  • Good amount of tools for visualization.
  • Less amount of time taken to perform analysis.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • These examples are due to the way we use Apache Solr. I think we have had the same problems with other NoSQL databases (but perhaps not the same solution). High data volumes of data and a lot of users were the causes.
  • We have lot of classifications and lot of data for each classification. This gave us several problems:
  • First: We couldn't keep all our data in Solr. Then we have all data in our MySQL DB and searching data in Solr. So we need to be sure to update and match the 2 databases in the same time.
  • Second: We needed several load balanced Solr databases.
  • Third: We needed to update all the databases and keep old data status.
  • If I don't speak about problems due to our lack of experience, the main Solr problem came from frequency of updates vs validation of several database. We encountered several locks due to this (our ops team didn't want to use real clustering, so all DB weren't updated). Problem messages were not always clear and we several days to understand the problems.
Read full review
IBM
  • The software is semi-limited to indexing and searching.
  • Software does not force a specific "structure" as some document management systems do.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
We tried to use both Elasticsearch and Swiftype with Drupal 8 but there are currently no good modules that integrate Drupal with those solutions. So Solr was really the only option for a Drupal 8 web site. It's not as easy to learn or use as Swiftype, but in the end I think it will be a little less expensive and offer more customization and flexibility.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Watson is not quite in the same category as Worldox or NetDocuments as both are full-fledged document management. However, both vendors provide a similar searching and indexing product. Worldox provides searching and indexing but the Indexer is somewhat prone to issues. IBM Watson does not have the stability/consistency issues. NetDocuments is cloud-hosted document management and its index does not seem to have issues. That being said, there is a large premium as the data is all stored in a cloud container with the management system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • It has enabled my organization to find information faster by being a one-stop service to search across content that were indexed from varying sources.
  • By using synonyms and usual lemmatizations / stemming, it enabled discovery of new content following every search.
Read full review
IBM
  • It has provided a positive work environment.
  • Since its easy and understandable good amount of team communication improved.
Read full review
ScreenShots