Apache Solr vs. IBM Watson Content Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Solr
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Apache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A
IBM Watson Content Analytics
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Content Analytics is an enterprise search option. This supersedes IBM's older offerings, IBM Omnifind and IBM Content Analytics and Enterprise Search.N/A
Pricing
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Best Alternatives
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache SolrIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Very effective for end-user searching applications and for generating search results. Also very well suited to those looking for high reliability and performance. If [you're doing] fuzzy searching or if you are working on a smaller end-user application or an internal application that does not require high performance and flexible/adapting searching then it may not be necessary to use Solr.
Read full review
It is well suited for those who are beginners and want to get hands-on with data analysis. It is also easy to learn as the UI is simple and understandable. It can be improved on provided some discounts in the pricing.
Read full review
Pros
  • Faceted navigation and field collapsing/grouping : filtering and quick results were what we needed for our websites. Our customers needed to have this functionalities for good and efficient results.
  • We tested them with our customers' registered searches (they received all new goods matching with their registered searches by emails and/or mobile push). Results were incredible by comparison with our old system (old MySQL requests).
  • Note : we didn't put all our data in Solr. Just what we need for searching uses. Other data stayed in our MySQL database.
  • Auto-suggest : our old auto-suggest wasn't performing well. With Apache Solr, our new one was worked really well ! The suggestions came quickly and suggestions were good.
  • We also extended auto-suggestion with geo-spatial data and it worked well.
  • Hit highlighting : we used this functionality and we didn't have problem and nasty surprise.
  • Keep all data status during data upgrading (see next details for improvements)
Read full review
  • Easy Interface - Drag and click based UI.
  • Good amount of tools for visualization.
  • Less amount of time taken to perform analysis.
Read full review
Cons
  • Ease of use -- this is not always the easier platform to configure.
  • Developer Community -- There are not a whole lot of folks out there that understand this stuff so finding talent is difficult.
  • Drupal 8 -- We've been frustrated with slow development on APIs for Drupal 8 integration.
Read full review
  • The software is semi-limited to indexing and searching.
  • Software does not force a specific "structure" as some document management systems do.
Read full review
Usability
It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We switched from search indexes stored in MySQL to soar and it's made a world of difference for our growing businesses. The relational databases are very poor for handling the complex data searches require and Solr delivered all the tools we need to get the performance our end users are demanding.
Read full review
IBM Watson is not quite in the same category as Worldox or NetDocuments as both are full-fledged document management. However, both vendors provide a similar searching and indexing product. Worldox provides searching and indexing but the Indexer is somewhat prone to issues. IBM Watson does not have the stability/consistency issues. NetDocuments is cloud-hosted document management and its index does not seem to have issues. That being said, there is a large premium as the data is all stored in a cloud container with the management system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's enabled us to deliver fast, relevant search results on our new website. The site is still in beta and being actively developed so our complete ROI is still unknown.
  • It integrates very well with Drupal so it has saved us from having to develop a custom solution.
Read full review
  • Organized, easy to produce search results.
  • Never lose a document again.
Read full review
ScreenShots