Apache Solr vs. Glean

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Solr
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Apache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A
Glean
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Glean is an AI-powered workplace search tool that supports search across all of a company's apps, centralizing company knowledge and helping employees to more quickly find what they need, with 100+ connectors.
$12
per month
Pricing
Apache SolrGlean
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Glean for Individuals - Monthly
$12
per month
Glean for Individuals - 1 Year
$129
one-time fee
Glean for Individuals - 2 Year
$245
one-time fee
Glean for Individuals - 3 Year
$348
one-time fee
Glean for Individuals - 4 Year
$439
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache SolrGlean
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache SolrGlean
Best Alternatives
Apache SolrGlean
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache SolrGlean
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache SolrGlean
Likelihood to Recommend
Very effective for end-user searching applications and for generating search results. Also very well suited to those looking for high reliability and performance. If [you're doing] fuzzy searching or if you are working on a smaller end-user application or an internal application that does not require high performance and flexible/adapting searching then it may not be necessary to use Solr.
Read full review
I think Glean can help any organization. It creates an internal search engine that is specific to your organization, and brings everything into one place. This allows you to access content you may not have otherwise found, especially because other systems do not have effective search capabilities
Read full review
Pros
  • Faceted navigation and field collapsing/grouping : filtering and quick results were what we needed for our websites. Our customers needed to have this functionalities for good and efficient results.
  • We tested them with our customers' registered searches (they received all new goods matching with their registered searches by emails and/or mobile push). Results were incredible by comparison with our old system (old MySQL requests).
  • Note : we didn't put all our data in Solr. Just what we need for searching uses. Other data stayed in our MySQL database.
  • Auto-suggest : our old auto-suggest wasn't performing well. With Apache Solr, our new one was worked really well ! The suggestions came quickly and suggestions were good.
  • We also extended auto-suggestion with geo-spatial data and it worked well.
  • Hit highlighting : we used this functionality and we didn't have problem and nasty surprise.
  • Keep all data status during data upgrading (see next details for improvements)
Read full review
  • Index Data
  • Connect Data Sources
  • Streamline Data Retrieval
Read full review
Cons
  • Ease of use -- this is not always the easier platform to configure.
  • Developer Community -- There are not a whole lot of folks out there that understand this stuff so finding talent is difficult.
  • Drupal 8 -- We've been frustrated with slow development on APIs for Drupal 8 integration.
Read full review
  • Surfacing results that are often clicked on at the top of the search results (i.e. a recommended result)
  • Use AI to suggest question answers based on search results
Read full review
Usability
It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We switched from search indexes stored in MySQL to soar and it's made a world of difference for our growing businesses. The relational databases are very poor for handling the complex data searches require and Solr delivered all the tools we need to get the performance our end users are demanding.
Read full review
I like Glean a lot better as it's more intuitive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's enabled us to deliver fast, relevant search results on our new website. The site is still in beta and being actively developed so our complete ROI is still unknown.
  • It integrates very well with Drupal so it has saved us from having to develop a custom solution.
Read full review
  • Easy and quick search
  • merger for all the tools
  • made life easier , can't work without Glean
Read full review
ScreenShots