Apache Pig vs. Kognitio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Pig
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Apache Pig is a programming tool for creating MapReduce programs used in Hadoop.N/A
Kognitio
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
WX2 is the data and analytics focused data warehouse appliance solution from UK company Kognitio.N/A
Pricing
Apache PigKognitio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache PigKognitio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache PigKognitio
Best Alternatives
Apache PigKognitio
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache PigKognitio
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache PigKognitio
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache Pig is best suited for ETL-based data processes. It is good in performance in handling and analyzing a large amount of data. it gives faster results than any other similar tool. It is easy to implement and any user with some initial training or some prior SQL knowledge can work on it. Apache Pig is proud to have a large community base globally.
Read full review
What I like most is the IN Memory capability it is doing, as we all know RAM is faster than disk. The capability to connect different databases. Beginners should also take note of the Data Disk Management because anytime it could go wrong, you should have experience in dealing with this kind of event.
Read full review
Pros
  • Iterative Development - you can write aliases/variables, which are not immediately executed and these are stored in a DAG, which is only evaluated upon dumping or storing another alias.
  • Fast execution - Works with MapReduce, Tez, or Spark execution frameworks to provide fast run times at large scales.
  • Local and remote interoperability - Scripts that depend on testing a small dataset locally before moving to the full thing can simply be done with "pig -x local."
Read full review
  • Ultra fast query results.
  • IN Memory Database.
  • Easy integration to reporting services.
Read full review
Cons
  • May not fit every need and a SQL-like abstraction may be more effective for some tasks (look at Spark-SQL, Hive, or even an actual DBMS)
  • All Pig jobs are written in a Domain Specific Language so not a lot of transferable knowledge
  • Writing your own User Defined Functions (UDFS) is a nice feature but can be painful to implement in practice
Read full review
  • Problems Could Be Encountered is particularly pronounced in more complex analyses.
  • Categorical variables are often not precise enough
Read full review
Usability
It is quick, fast and easy to implement Apache Pig which makes is quite popular to be used.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The documentation is adequate. I'm not sure how large of an external community there is for support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It takes me less time to write a Pig script than get a Spark program running for batch ETL workloads. Compared to Spark, Pig has a steeper learning curve because it employs a proprietary programming language. In one script and one fine, it can handle both Map Reduce and Hadoop. It has a large amount of documentation available to make learning more convenient.
Read full review
The understandable and complete tables and graphs, the cleaning methods and the way of encrypting the data are quite feasible, which does not help to prepare our data, it helps that the data that is thrown as results is separated from each other, the process prior to structuring requires high-level advice and is somewhat time-consuming, there is a risk that they overwrite the data themselves by accident at a later time
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Return on Investments are significant considering what it can do with traditional analysis techniques. But, other alternatives like Apache Spark, Hive being more efficient, it is hard to stick to Apache Pig.
  • It can handle large datasets pretty easily compared to SQL. But, again, alternatives are more efficient.
  • While working on unstructured, decentralized dataset, Pig is highly beneficial, as it is not a complete deviation from SQL, but it does not take you in complexity MapReduce as well.
Read full review
  • The implementation of the formats to integrate the users we have and the program is also good.
  • I also improve the control of aspects related to the work environment
Read full review
ScreenShots