TrustRadius

Apache Log4j vs. IBM Security QRadar Log Insights

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Log4j
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Log4j is a Java-based logging utility from the Apache Foundation, available free and open source.N/A
IBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security® QRadar® Log Insights helps users gain complete over a company's growing digital footprint. It is designed to address security observability needs with simple data ingestion, rapid search and visualizations. QRadar Log Insights extracts, investigates and pull sdata from anywhere, and it can perform multiple, concurrent searches on large data subsets in seconds. Its interactive dashboards and analytics help users to detect, investigate and plan action against threats faster.N/A
Pricing
Apache Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Apache Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Small Businesses
SolarWinds Papertrail
SolarWinds Papertrail
Score 8.9 out of 10
SolarWinds Papertrail
SolarWinds Papertrail
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
There is multiple reasons. All types are logging messages support not only string msg. We can use parametrized variables for logging Support advance filter for logging like (Data, Markers, Regular Expression) Support Plugin Architecture (We just use the dependency and Layout configuration with minimal config, and this will start to work) Integration support with application server Could enable.
AD
Anil Darji
Technical Lead
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Pros
Apache
  • Integration with java.
  • Configure logging levels.
  • Customize logging contents.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Cons
Apache
  • Fixed the vulnerability which is reported which affect many big brand.
  • There should be security check to check all vulnerability.
AD
Anil Darji
Technical Lead
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
The ability to customize logging levels and manage log files is superior to other products we have looked at; due to this we selected to go with log4j.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Good logging tools we can integrate with minimal resource consumption.
  • Ease of understanding.
  • Plugin play component Architecture.
  • Advance filter support can be used to filter all types of logs and events, which can be further analyzed.
AD
Anil Darji
Technical Lead
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots