Apache Geode vs. Astra DB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Geode
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A
Astra DB
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Astra DB from DataStax is a vector database for developers that need to get accurate Generative AI applications into production, fast.N/A
Pricing
Apache GeodeAstra DB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GeodeAstra DB
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Apache GeodeAstra DB
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
8.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Astra DB
-
Ratings
Performance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vector Database
Comparison of Vector Database features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
-
Ratings
Astra DB
6.8
Ratings
0% below category average
Vector Data Connection00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Vector Data Editing00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Attribute Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Geospatial Analysis00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Geometric Transformations00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Vector Data Visualization00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Coordinate Reference System Management:00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Data Import/Export00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Symbolization and Styling00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Data Sharing and Collaboration00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GeodeAstra DB
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GeodeAstra DB
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GeodeAstra DB
Likelihood to Recommend
The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
Read full review
We use Astra DB to improve our management systems. Storing data has become hassle-free and quite simple. When launching a Cassandra-based cloud application, Astra DB is exactly what you need. In addition to the standard training programs and videos, the extended support and training require significant additional effort to activate and cover which I feel is a bit more tedious task.
Read full review
Pros
  • Super Fast data pull/push
  • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
  • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
Read full review
  • We need to be able to process a lot of data (our biggest clients process hundreds of milions of transactions every month). However, it is not only the amount of data, it is also an unpredictable patterns with spikes occuring at different points of time - something athat Astra is great at.
  • Our processing needs to be extremaly fast. Some of our clients use our enrichment in a synchronous way, meaning that any delay in processing is holding up the whole transaction lifecycle and can have a major impact on the client. Astra is very fast.
  • A close collaboration with GCP makes our life very easy. All of our technology sits in Google Cloud, so having Astra in there makes it a no-brainer solution for us.
Read full review
Cons
  • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
  • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
  • Needs more community support, documentation.
Read full review
  • Astra DB might be difficult to understand for people who are unfamiliar with Apache Cassandra. Improving the initial experience for newcomers, as well as offering better documentation and lessons, might be advantageous.
  • The Astra DB ecosystem may be enhanced by expanding the ecosystem of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed solutions.
Read full review
Usability
Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
Read full review
It's a great product but suffers with counters. This isn't a deal breaker but lets down what is otherwise a good all round solution
Read full review
Support Rating
Never contacted support
Read full review
Their response time is fast, in case you do not contact them during business hours, they give a very good follow-up to your case. They also facilitate video calls if necessary for debugging.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
Read full review
We also (briefly) considered building in-house. We wanted to avoid complex "Frankenstein" architectures. Combining Pinecone with another NoSQL datastore like DynamoDB would have increased complexity. A single-managed platform (Astra DB) enabled architectural simplicity and strong reliability, allowing Maester’s development team to prioritize high-value, customer-facing features
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We are well aware of the Cassandra architecture and familiar with the open source tooling that Datastax provides the industry (K8sSandra / Stargate) to scale Cassandra on Kubernetes.
Having prior knowledge of Cassandra / Kubernetes means we know that under the hood Astra is built on infinitely scalable technologies. We trust that the foundations that Astra is built on will scale so we know Astra will scale.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
  • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
  • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
Read full review
  • Database growth planning is less of a concern with Astra, as it scales automatically.
  • Currently, they lack fine-grained security at the table level. I suspect that will change over time.
  • If your load has peaks and valleys; Astra enables only paying for Reads/Writes; thus you do not need to pay for large servers to support peaks in load.
Read full review
ScreenShots