TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Flink

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AApache Flink is a framework and distributed processing engine for stateful computations over unbounded and bounded data streams. Flink has been designed to run in all common cluster environments, perform computations at in-memory speed and at any scale. And FlinkCEP is the Complex Event Processing (CEP) library implemented on top of Flink. Users can detect event patterns in streams of events.N/A

    Striim

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AStriim is an enterprise-grade platform that offers continuous real-time data ingestion, high-speed in-flight stream processing, and sub-second delivery of data to cloud and on-premises endpoints.

    $4,400

    per month per 100 million Striim events

    Pricing
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Striim Cloud Enterprise Platform
    $4,400
    per month per 100 million Striim events
    Striim Platform
    $20,000
    per year per VCPU
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Streaming Analytics
    Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Apache Flink and Striim
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Striim
    -
    Ratings
    Real-Time Data Analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Low Latency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data wrangling and preparation6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Linear Scale-Out9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Enrichment10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Source Connection
    Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Apache Flink and Striim
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    -
    Ratings
    Striim
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Data Transformations
    Comparison of Data Transformations features of Apache Flink and Striim
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    -
    Ratings
    Striim
    8.9
    2 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Simple transformations00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Complex transformations00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
    Data Modeling
    Comparison of Data Modeling features of Apache Flink and Striim
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    -
    Ratings
    Striim
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Data model creation00 Ratings8.42 Ratings
    Metadata management00 Ratings8.42 Ratings
    Business rules and workflow00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Collaboration00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
    Testing and debugging00 Ratings7.22 Ratings
    Data Governance
    Comparison of Data Governance features of Apache Flink and Striim
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    -
    Ratings
    Striim
    9.5
    1 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Small Businesses
    Amazon Kinesis
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Skyvia
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Confluent
    Score9.9 out of 10
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Spotfire Streaming
    Score6.6 out of 10
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache FlinkStriim
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Striim
    Below samples are the well suited use cases; - Change data capture feature seamlessly works on popular RDMS. You can make enrichments on several data sources within the same Striim application. - You can install stand alone agents and start streaming log files to Striim servers. This is mainly useful for security operations or audit trail use cases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics
    • Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities
    • Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems
    • Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Striim
    • GoldenGate Trail reader which iss faster than Oracle CDC. It does not used logminer, hence there is no load on source Oracle database.
    • Easy installation and upgrade in 5 minutes
    • Support is very good. Fast and user friendly.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option
    • Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding
    • Community smaller than other frameworks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Striim
    • License a bit expensive
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Striim
    Faster, checkpointing better. CDC works well. The loading is faster. Easy upgrade and installation. Uses less resource.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines
    • Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business
    • Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Striim
    • We got the license at a discount price
    Read full review
    ScreenShots