Apache Druid vs. Apache HBase

It is extremely well suited to rapid ingest of data from large data sources, due to the fact that you can restrict what is ingested by column/field, so that you only pull in the data you actually want or need.

As stated earlier, the open source version could use better cluster management tools, and troubleshooting tools for failing jobs/tasks.

HBase is well suited for streaming ingest, fast lookups, massive datasets, data warehouse lookup tables, RDBMS replacement, MongoDB replacement, key-value store, data scans, logs, JSON storage and some binary storage. My preferred use case is for storing data points like time series or data produced by sensors. I often use HBase when I need data available immediately and I am not looking for transactions. This is a great store for really wide tables with tons of columns. It is also great if you are not sure what type of data you are going to have. It really excels at sparse data.

Incentivized

• Rapid ingest
• Limiting ingest to only the relevant fields/columns
• Easy ingest spec creation

• Scalable and truly non-relational data
• HBase operations run in real-time on its database rather than MapReduce jobs
• Scales linearly to support billions of rows with millions of columns

Incentivized

• Security configuration is problematic
• Cluster management could have more features
• Troubleshooting incomplete tasks/jobs is a chore

• Write performance
• Performance support for parquet file format. supports, but performance wise still not there
• API / library availability for spark, rather than creating a new library for it

Incentivized

There's really not anything else out there that I've seen comparable for my use cases. HBase has never proven me wrong. Some companies align their whole business on HBase and are moving all of their infrastructure from other database engines to HBase. It's also open source and has a very collaborative community.

Incentivized

Compared NoSQL databases with traditional databases for faster retrieval and consistency. As MongoDB is a NoSQL supports dynamic fields, however, query performance is bad for aggregations and added maintenance. When compared with MySQL and Teradata, it could not scale up as fast as Hbase and added cost involved to it. HBase can be easily scalable to a huge volume of records, have a faster lookup and provides consistency

Incentivized

• Integration with S3 storage has saved about 35% on our storage, over HDFS
• The rapid ingest has saved user's time in the query aspects of their applications.
• The ability to ingest from a variety of data sources has made overall user application queries much simpler

• Positive: Open source, easy to use, good to store big data.
• Negative: SQL functionalities are not available.
• More memory utilization
• More troubleshooting

Incentivized