TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Drill

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AApache Drill is a schema-free query engine for use with NoSQL or Hadoop data or file storage systems and databases.N/A

    HPE Data Fabric

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AHPE Data Fabric (formerly MapR, acquired by HPE in 2019) is a software-defined datastore and file system that simplifies data management and analytics by unifying data across core, edge, and multicloud sources into a single platform.N/A
    Pricing
    Apache DrillHPE Data Fabric
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache DrillHPE Data Fabric
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Apache DrillHPE Data Fabric
    Small Businesses
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Cloudera Manager
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Apache Spark
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache DrillHPE Data Fabric
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.2
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache DrillHPE Data Fabric
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    if you're doing joins from hBASE, hdfs, cassandra and redis, then this works. Using it as a be all end all does not suit it. This is not your straight forward magic software that works for all scenarios. One needs to determine the use case to see if Apache Drill fits the needs. 3/4 of the time, usually it does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    MapR is more well-suited for people who know what they are doing. I consider MapR the Hadoop distribution professionals use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • queries multiple data sources with ease.
    • supports sql, so non technical users who know sql, can run query sets
    • 3rd party tools, like tableau, zoom data and looker were able to connect with no issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • MapR had very fast I/O throughput. The write speed was several times faster than what we could achieve with the other Hadoop vendors (Cloudera and Hortonworks). This is because MapR does not use HDFS, which is essentially a "meta filesystem". HDFS is built on top of the filesystem provided by the OS. MapR has their filesystem called MapR-FS, which is a true filesystem and accesses the raw disk drives.
    • The MapR filesystem is very easy to integrate with other Linux filesystems. When working with HDFS from Apache Hadoop, you usually have to use either the HDFS API or various Hadoop/HDFS command line utilities to interact with HDFS. You cannot use command line utilities native to the host operation system, which is usually Linux. At least, it is not easily done without setting up NFS, gateways, etc. With MapR-FS, you can mount the filesystem within Linux and use the standard Unix commands to manipulate files.
    • The HBase distribution provided by MapR is very similar to the Apache HBase distribution. Cloudera and Hortonworks add GUIs and other various tools on top of their HBase distributions. The MapR HBase distribution is very similar to the Apache distribution, which is nice if you are more accustomed to using Apache HBase.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • deployment. Not as easy
    • configuration isn't as straight forward, especially with the documentation
    • Garbage collection could be improved upon
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • It takes time to get latest versions of Apache ecosystem tools released as it has to be adapted.
    • When you have issues related to Mapr-FS or Mapr Tables, its hard to figure them out by ourselves.
    • Sometime new ecosystem tools versions are released without proper QA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    if Presto comes up with more support (ie hbase, s3), then its strongly possible that we'll move from apache drill to prestoDB. However, Apache drill needs more configuration ease, especially when it comes to garbage collection tuning. If apache drill could support also sparkSQL and Flume, then it does change drill into being something more valuable than prestoDB
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    compared to presto, has more support than prestodb. Impala has limitations to what drill can support apache phoenix only supports for hbase. no support for cassandra. Apache drill was chosen, because of the multiple data stores that it supports htat the other 3 do not support. Presto does not support hbase as of yet. Impala does not support query to cassandra
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    I don't believe there is as much support for MapR yet compared to other more widely known products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Configuration has taken some serious time out.
    • Garbage collection tuning. is a constant hassle. time and effort applied to it, vs dedicating resources elsewhere.
    • w/ sql support, reduces the need of devs to generate the resultset for analysts, when they can run queries themselves (if they know sql).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Increased employee efficiency for sure. Our clients have various levels of expertise in their deployment and user teams, and we never receive complaints about MapR.
    • MapR is used by one of our financial services clients who uses it for fraud detection and user pattern analysis. They are able to turn around data much faster than they previously had with in-house applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots