Anthropic is an AI research company whose product, Claude, is an AI assistant available for a variety of business tasks. Boasting a 100K+ token windows, Claude can handle complex multi-step instructions over large amounts of content.
$20
per month
ChatGPT
Score9.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenAI offers ChatGPT, an advanced general intelligence (AGI) chatbot which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
$0
per month
Pricing
Claude
ChatGPT
Editions & Modules
Pro
$20
per month
Team - Standard
$30
per month per seat (minimum 5)
Team - Premium
$150
per month per seat (minimum 5)
Max
from $100
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Free
$0
per month
Plus
$20
per month
Team
$30
per month per user
Pro
$200
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claude
ChatGPT
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual billing and Pro, Max and Standard Team plans. Claude Code included in higher tier service. Usage-based billing available with API access plans with discount for batch processing.
CEO in Information Technology at RIO3 Consulting (Computer Software, 1-10 employees)
Chose Claude
Anthropic Claude is just as good as any of the aforementioned platforms. We were using ChatGPT primarily before Claude. We have leaned more to Claude in recent months, but use other solutions to keep a balanced approach to research and analysis. We plan to keep Claude as a …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
OpenAI
Verified User
Chose ChatGPT
For breaking news and very up to date data, Grok and Perplexity are better. They have access to very recent or proprietary data that's relevant to any topic you want to research. Gemini is great for large prompt context needs. I would use Claude for more coding related stuff. …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Owner in Marketing at CWN (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees)
Chose ChatGPT
ChatGPT is simply the most complete, well-rounded AI tool in existence right now. It can do everything the others can, often better, and often in a way that's more intuitive and easier to iterate. It takes prompts far better than most, and incorporates direction better than …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior Analyst in Research & Development at WTW (Insurance, 501-1000 employees)
Chose ChatGPT
In my experience ChatGPT does great job than any other LLM model at this moment. However, in terms of web search, Perplexity scores high compared to ChatGPT because ChatGPT misses critical news while doing web crawling
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose ChatGPT
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose ChatGPT
ChatGPT is an excellent writing, ideating, and editing assistant with an American attitude. This LLM learns from human input and can give very sound results in unexpected situations. 'Memory' feature is especially useful, because it saves a lot of time and effort, so the LLM …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Front End Web Designer in Professional Services at Everyday Health Inc. (Online Media, 51-200 employees)
Chose ChatGPT
In my experience, Claude won't say things it feels is offensive or callous (for instance I asked for themed slogans for a bachelor party where I was the best man), and only provided G and PG related content. ChatGPT was quick to get naughty with puns and slogans, especially …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Claude is well suited to help build documentation, strategic plans, and document analysis very well. I just recently had a client ask me for Terms & Conditions of a new service offering we are developing. I had Claude look at some existing artifacts we have already created and added some additional key points, to develop our T&C. Claude helped streamline the process in a few hours, that could have take several days to weeks to fine tune
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I’d definitely recommend ChatGPT to anyone as a great introduction to generative AI and as a starting point in research, writing, brainstorming, or general questions or judgement questions. It can be a great tool to use when you don’t necessarily need an accurate answer. For example, I wouldn’t let it calculate my taxes, but I’d use it to ask some general tax questions, then ask for sources and then verify by checking those sources. I also love ChatGPT for writing and questions - it’s great for emails, creating templates and outlines, and for generating spreadsheet formulas.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Saves time by generating content about a specific topic very quickly
Allows us to quickly learn information online (from various sources or even a single lengthy article) into more summed up digestible paragraphs (and even bullet points)
Can autogenerate content on a vast amount of topics
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Wish it had support for better slides generation. Sometimes we found ourselves using chatgpt to outline a presentation but build it ourselves or use a tool like Gamma
Maybe a chepear $10 plan. In some countries the US dollar can be expensive and $20 goes a long way.
I wish you could make projects with more files. They limit it. Or make the limit based on the content, not the number of files per se
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ChatGPT is a powerful assistant. As long as you understand what it is you're looking for in its results, it can save you a lot of time due to its ability to do the heavy lifting for you. This frees your time up to enable you to concentrate on other tasks.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Claude is a trusted platform from our perspective. We have been using this platform (paid version) more and more the past few months. The value returned is more than worth it. As more integrations points happen, we see Claude being a long term part of our ecosystem. Data creation, analysis, and assessments can be a tedious process. Claude delivers robust and efficient outcomes that help us for on higher level tasks.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's a potent utility tool, personally and professionally. It’s also very convenient - it can be used for a wide range of things and scenarios, and when used correctly, it usually produces dependable results in seconds. I would give it a full 10 if it didn't hallucinate as much as it does, and the image generator was more accurate.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Anthropic Claude is just as good as any of the aforementioned platforms. We were using ChatGPT primarily before Claude. We have leaned more to Claude in recent months, but use other solutions to keep a balanced approach to research and analysis. We plan to keep Claude as a core component of our tech stack moving forward, as it has proven value time and time again.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
they all work very similar, and since answers are probabilistic, sometimes you get better answers from other similar apps. ChatGPT was a pioneer and its several iterations have made many improvements in usability. It's as a wide set of knowledge and you can pretty much ask it anything. But for complex tasks (reminders, automations, data science related tasks) it still needs a lot of work
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ROI is immediate in the consulting space. We draft documents for clients often and have the ability to produce exponential output with Claude.
Claude has allowed us to develop HTML and java code based on our requirements for a client. It has also helped identify bad code and shortened our development lifecycle
Claude has turned into a value added platform that we rely on to verify information and provide suggestions. We look at Claude as a strategic technology partner
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can solve problems quickly. What would take some time, for example, writing an SPF string, ChatGPT can do it correctly in seconds if I it gives the correct information.
The best tool I've ever used for research. For example, I can ask ChatGPT to list all the villages, cities and townships in a specific county. And provide the URL link for each.
Problems that seem unsolvable, i.e. why is Gmal rejecting every message from our list server is answered with a number of suggestions that I can follow up with.
Basically, has elimited a tech support position in our company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
