Frontline Systems Analytic Solver is an Excel add-on for performing data mining, and predictive analytics from within Microsoft Excel.
N/A
RapidMiner
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
RapidMiner is a data science and data mining platform, from Altair since the late 2022 acquisition. RapidMiner offers full automation for non-coding domain experts, an integrated JupyterLab environment for seasoned data scientists, and a visual drag-and-drop designer. RapidMiner’s project-based framework helps to ensure that others can build off their work using visual workflows or automated data science.
$7,500
Per User Per Month
Pricing
Analytic Solver
RapidMiner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$7,500.00
Per User Per Month
Enterprise
$15,000.00
Per User Per Month
AI Hub
$54,000.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Analytic Solver
RapidMiner
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Analytic Solver
RapidMiner
Features
Analytic Solver
RapidMiner
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Analytic Solver
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
MDM Integration
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Analytic Solver
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Visualization
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Analytic Solver
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
8.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Data Transformations
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Data Encryption
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Analytic Solver
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
1. It is good tool for a mathematical model which is a single period and deterministic model 2. It is good for the users who are comfortable in handling the Excel Solver and needs to upgrade the Excel Solver for more than 200 variables 3. It works well for the multiple objective problems. 4. Difficult to manage the big model as 100 constraints and 2000 variables can limit the use of the tool's efficiency. 5. Its limitation is that a model designer can not make a big and complex model.
RapidMiner is the best tool to build models on textual data. It is rich in ML algorithms and reduces the need to manually tune the parameters. It automatically optimizes them, thus providing a better solution. RapidMiner again extends great capability for data preparation, its insane connections to almost every data source pulls in the data easily into one environment. And it can comfortably perform data cleaning and process tasks over that. RapidMiner is not so good with image, audio or video data. These data points cannot be used directly in their raw form. They must be transformed into some intermediate form for performing analytics over it. Moreover, there are no connectors to directly pull data from their varied sources. For example, we don't have a connector to read audio data directly from a switch and then convert it to text (although Google speech API is available for audio to text conversion.)
On the few occasions when I have used it to deal with problems of optimization of relatively large parameters (with a large number of restrictions and decision variables), the program has been slower, not substantially but slower, than programs such as the WinQsb, even when the latter runs on 32-bit machines and not 64. That has caught my attention, even though it is not a real problem for the uses I give to the program.
Given my partial function as a university professor, it has been much more effective and practical to use other software, due to the limited options that the educational license associated with the software has.
Wish the tool was more efficient in terms of processing power. The tool takes a lot of CPU processing power, even for a small process on a small data set
Wish there were more options on charts and graphs to visualize the data
The use of this software does not necessarily follow that it is "globally better" than others. In the department we have used this and others with similar characteristics, given that, as previously indicated, all the software has advantages and weaknesses with respect to other software with similar characteristics. Obtaining better results lies in the user's ability to detect those "benefits and weaknesses" and maximize their usefulness within the specific field of work in which they operate. In our case, one of the reasons that led us to try and use it, was related to trying to "tie" more processes to the same environment, which in this case is the one associated with the Excel database, in such a way as to reduce the initial manipulation and accommodation that should be made to the data if they come from different sources such as MATLAB, or WinQsb. This facilitates the use of software for the type of user who does not necessarily have deep knowledge of linear algebra or operations research, for example.
On the contrary, the most analytical and knowledgeable user manifested in a high percentage, preferring to use MATLAB as a tool, claiming that they have a greater and easier access to the calculation functions, which even in specific cases, could be modified.
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual workflow and therefore it is easier to demonstrate and visualise the processes involves in getting the desired results. Visualization of workflow enhances teaching and learning. RapidMiner is rich with algorithms and online learning materials that can assist students in their self-directed learning on data preparation, machine learning, deep learning, text mining, and predictive analytics. Moreover, RapidMiner repository has more than 1500 machine learning algorithms and functions that students can explore for any case study and assignments. The RapidMIner is also an open platform that can seamlessly integrates with other applications programmed with other programming languages like R and Python.
- It has allowed finding ways to optimize (minimizing costs or times) the field processes involved in various projects.
It has even allowed, in specific cases where it was used for that purpose, to optimize the allocation of resources (people) to work in different jobs that present weekly variations of the activity that these people must perform.
It has allowed the sensitivity analysis of projects to changes in the decision variables related to them, which, and in very dynamic and changing environments, resulted in substantial decreases in money losses.