TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Anaconda

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AAnaconda provides access to the foundational open-source Python and R packages used in modern AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions enable corporate, research, and academic institutions around the world to harness open-source for competitive advantage and research. Anaconda also provides enterprise-grade security to open-source software through the Premium Repository.

    $0

    per month

    Mathematica

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AWolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.

    $1,520

    per year

    Pricing
    AnacondaMathematica
    Editions & Modules
    Free Tier
    $0
    per month
    Starter Tier
    $9
    per month
    Business Tier
    $50
    per month per user
    Enterprise Tier
    60.00+
    per month per user
    Standard Cloud
    $1,520
    per year
    Standard Desktop
    $3,040
    one-time fee
    Standard Desktop & Cloud
    $3,344
    one-time fee
    Mathematica Enterprise Edition
    $8,150.00
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AnacondaMathematica
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AnacondaMathematica
    Considered Both Products
    Anaconda
    No answer on this topic
    Wolfram
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AnacondaMathematica
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.3
    25 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.822 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources8.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection9.721 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration9.614 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    8.5
    25 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization9.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis8.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.0
    26 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.823 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations8.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption9.719 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors9.620 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.2
    24 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning8.921 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development10.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery9.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.5
    21 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    6 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.84 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.96 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.3
    8 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Anaconda and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AnacondaMathematica
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Looker Studio
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jupyter Notebook
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    Grafana
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AnacondaMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (38 ratings)
    9.9
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AnacondaMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Anaconda
    I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
    Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Anaconda
    • Anaconda is a one-stop destination for important data science and programming tools such as Jupyter, Spider, R etc.
    • Anaconda command prompt gave flexibility to use and install multiple libraries in Python easily.
    • Jupyter Notebook, a famous Anaconda product is still one of the best and easy to use product for students like me out there who want to practice coding without spending too much money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
    • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
    • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Anaconda
    • It can have a cloud interface to store the work.
    • Compatible for large size files.
    • I used R Studio for building Machine Learning models, Many times when I tried to run the entire code together the software would crash. It would lead to loss of data and changes I made.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Should include more libraries and functions.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Anaconda
    It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Anaconda
    I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Anaconda
    Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Anaconda
    I have experience using RStudio oustide of Anaconda. RStudio can be installed via anaconda, but I like to use RStudio separate from Anaconda when I am worin in R. I tend to use Anaconda for python and RStudio for working in R. Although installing libraries and packages can sometimes be tricky with both RStudio and Anaconda, I like installing R packages via RStudio. However, for anything python-related, Anaconda is my go to!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Anaconda
    • It has helped our organization to work collectively faster by using Anaconda's collaborative capabilities and adding other collaboration tools over.
    • By having an easy access and immediate use of libraries, developing times has decreased more than 20 %
    • There's an enormous data scientist shortage. Since Anaconda is very easy to use, we have to be able to convert several professionals into the data scientist. This is especially true for an economist, and this my case. I convert myself to Data Scientist thanks to my econometrics knowledge applied with Anaconda.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
    • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
    • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots