TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Tensor Flow

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAmazon TensorFlow enables developers to quickly and easily get started with deep learning in the cloud.N/A

    Azure Machine Learning

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.

    $0

    per month

    Pricing
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Studio Pricing - Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Production Web API - Dev/Test
    $0.00
    per month
    Studio Pricing - Standard
    $9.99
    per ML studio workspace/per month
    Production Web API - Standard S1
    $100.13
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S2
    $1000.06
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S3
    $9999.98
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon Tensor Flow
    Microsoft Azure is better than Amazon Tensor Flow because it provides easier and pre-built capabilities such as Anomaly Detection, Recommendation, and Ranking.

    AWS is better than IBM Watson ML Studio because it has direct and prebuilt clustering capabilities
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Small Businesses
    TensorFlow
    Score8.2 out of 10
    TensorFlow
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Tensor FlowAzure Machine Learning
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    A well-suited scenario for using AWS Tensor Flow is when having a project with a geographically dispersed team, a client overseas and large data to use for training. AWS Tensor Flow is less appropriate when working for clients in regions where it hasn't been allowed yet for use. Since smaller clients are in regions where AWS Tensor Flow hasn't been allowed for use, and those clients traditionally don't have enough hardware, this situation deters a wider use of the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    For [a] data scientist require[d] to build a machine learning model, so he/she didn't worry about infrastructure to maintain it.
    All kind of feature[s] such as train, build, deploy and monitor the machine learning model available in a single suite.
    If someone has [their] own environment for ML studio, so there [it would] not [be] useful for them.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) allows resizable compute capacity in the cloud, providing the necessary elasticity to provide services for both, small and medium-sized businesses.
    • Tensor Flow allows us to train our models much faster than in our on-premise equipment.
    • Most of the pre-trained models are easy to adapt to our clients' needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • User friendliness: This is by far the most user friendly tool I've seen in analytics. You don't need to know how to code at all! Just create a few blocks, connect a few lines and you are capable of running a boosted decision tree with a very high R squared!
    • Speed: Azure ML is a cloud based tool, so processing is not made with your computer, making the reliability and speed top notch!
    • Cost: If you don't know how to code, this is by far the cheapest machine learning tool out there. I believe it costs less than $15/month. If you know how to code, then R is free.
    • Connectivity: It is super easy to embed R or Python codes on Azure ML. So if you want to do more advanced stuff, or use a model that is not yet available on Azure ML, you can simply paste the code on R or Python there!
    • Microsoft environment: Many many companies rely on the Microsoft suite. And Azure ML connects perfectly with Excel, CSV and Access files.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • SageMaker isn't available in all regions. This is complicated for some clients overseas.
    • For larger instances, when using a GPU, it takes a while to talk to a customer service representative to ask for a limit increase. Given this, it's recommendable to ask in advance for a limit increase in more expensive and larger cases; otherwise, SageMaker will set the limit to zero by default.
    • Since the data has to be stored in S3 and copied to training, it doesn't allow to test and debug locally. Therefore, we have to wait a lot to check everything after every trail.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It would be great to have text tips that could ease new users to the platform, especially if an error shows up
    • Scenario-based documentation
    • Pre-processing of modules that had been previously run. Sometimes they need to be re-run for no apparent reason
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Easy and fastest way to develop, test, deploy and monitor the machine learning model.
    - Easy to load the data set
    -Drag and drop the process of the Machine learning life cycle.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Support is nonexistent. It's very frustrating to try and find someone to actually talk to. The robot chatbots are just not well trained.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Not sure
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    Microsoft Azure is better than Amazon Tensor Flow because it provides easier and pre-built capabilities such as Anomaly Detection, Recommendation, and Ranking. AWS is better than IBM Watson ML Studio because it has direct and prebuilt clustering capabilities AWS, like IBM Watson ML Studio, has powerful built-in algorithms, providing a stronger platform when comparing it with MS Azure ML Services and Google ML Engine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive: It has allowed us to work with our overseas teams without any large hardware investing.
    • Positive: Pre-trained models significantly reduce the time to develop solutions for our clients.
    • Negative: Since it's a relatively new tool, you have to be careful about not paying for large errors while learning to use the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Productivity: Instead of coding and recoding, Azure ML helped my organization to get to meaningful results faster;
    • Cost: Azure ML can save hundreds (or even thousands) of dollars for an organization, since the license costs around $15/month per seat.
    • Focus on insights and not on statistics: Since running a model is so easy, analysts can focus more on recommendations and insights, rather than statistical details
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots