Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) vs. AWS IoT Core

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon SQS
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Provides the Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS), a managed message queue service which supports the safe decoupling and distribution of different components in a cloud infrastructure and cloud applications.
$0
per GB
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
AWS IoT Core is a managed cloud service that lets connected devices interact with cloud applications and other devices. It includes the Device Gateway and the Message Broker, which connect and process messages between IoT devices and the cloud. AWS IoT Core connects AWS and Amazon services like AWS Lambda, Amazon Kinesis, Amazon S3, Amazon SageMaker, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon CloudWatch, AWS CloudTrail, Amazon QuickSight, and Alexa Voice Service to build IoT applications that gather, process,…
$0.08
Per Million Minutes
Pricing
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Editions & Modules
All Data Transfer In
$0.00
per GB
Standard Queue
$0.00000004
per request
FIFO Queue
$0.00000005
per request
Connectivity
$0.08
Per Million Minutes
Rules Engine
$0.15
Per Million Actions
Messaging
$1.00
Per Million Messages
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SQSAWS IoT Core
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Features
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)
-
Ratings
AWS IoT Core
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
IoT Device Management00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Device Security00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
IoT Data Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
IoT Analytics00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
IoT Integration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)AWS IoT Core
Likelihood to Recommend
While we use AmazonSimple Queue Service (SQS) in our serverless applications, it would be a great option to handle queue management for any internet-connect application. It provides the most benefit in situations where your application or service must maintain mission-critical queue of messages or jobs. If you're already using other AWS services you will find the greatest benefit.
Read full review
AWS iot core is very useful if you need to scale very quickly for managing lots of devices without handling the underlying infrastructure cost. It can enable real time publishing and subscription of devices, monitoring and early stage intervention in case of unexpected issues while developing a full stack solution. However, healthcare scenarios where government intervention is needed should be developed and scaled by following the set of compliance policies of the government and the SLA requirements of the customer. Finally, it is great where you need to do data science research after anonymizing data
Read full review
Pros
  • SQS is reliable and fully managed. Our engineers do not have to worry about running RabbitMQ.
  • SQS is very inexpensive.
  • SQS allows data to be encrypted in transit, which may be required for compliance in some products.
  • FIFO queues provide exactly-once processing.
Read full review
  • AWS IoT Core integrates power analytics and an AI solution for sensor data processing.
  • Great protocol support including HTTPs and MQTT required to connect resource constraint IoT devices to cloud
  • High security standards during data transmission
  • Scalability and a great user community
Read full review
Cons
  • More frequest polling will be expensive
  • No detailed monitoring of queues, just current data and regular monitoring is present
  • No way to fetch messages back from the queue
Read full review
  • It would be great to have better integration with other IoT products outside of AWS
  • It has been lagging in some of our applications. It's difficult to tell whether this is on AWS IoT or on our implementation
  • It would be great to support a wider range of protocols
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I give AWS IoT Core's overall usability this rating because it is very easy to use and is enjoyed by all of our staff. The only problem is that it sometimes glitches and it freezes a lot. So overall, the usability of AWS IoT Core is very good, and we will continue to use it.
Read full review
Support Rating
Online blogging and documentation for SQS is great. There are many examples of implementing it and if you look hard enough, more than likely there are examples that meet the exact case with which you are working
Read full review
It covers all the aspects of IoT services required for an IoT company. It supports all the industry-wide protocols for secure data transmission and integrates powerful AL and ML technology for data analytics. For data storage, Amazon S3 is a great solution. Strong tech support and user community. Since it is widely used as compared to other products, there is an abundance of training and learning material on the web.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
To be blunt: Amazon SQS was the simplest to implement given our requirements. Other services in this space work just as well, and SQS does not have any benefits outside of being the easiest to implement when using an otherwise fully AWS stack. AWS itself even has other solutions that would work just as well, however, SQS had the most reasonable pricing model for our given situation. That will certainly not always be the case, but in several of the instances where we are using it, it just made the most sense.
Read full review
Azure IoT is a good product but since our whole suite of tech is now set up in AWS (ec2, s3, sagemaker, cloud formation, etc.), we wanted something that could quickly adapt to our environments. Learning a new tech for IoT was simply a bottleneck that we wanted to avoid at this point.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Under the AWS Echo system, it provides great operating power to the application.
  • The cost is much less for messages, and it also supports a multi-user option.
  • Not for us, but for a larger organization, low throughput might become an issue for a standard queue type.
Read full review
  • Gives confidence to prototype iot solutions across lots of devices in little time
  • Ability to meet requirements for managing a variety of communication protocols
  • Learning iot analytics and visualization for faster insights enablement
  • Onboarding devices and managing quickly without building inhouse solutions
Read full review
ScreenShots