Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon SNS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services offers the Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) which provides pub/sub messaging and push notifications to iOS and Android devices. It is meant to operate in a microservices architecture and which can support event-driven contingencies and support the decoupling of applications.
$0.01
per 1 million
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ActiveMatrix Service Grid is an SOA governance and application server, from TIBCO.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Editions & Modules
API Requests & Payload Data
$0.01
per 1 million
API Requests
$0.50
per 1 million requests
Notification Deliveries
$0.50
per million notifications
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SNSTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Features
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
SOA Governance
Comparison of SOA Governance features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)
-
Ratings
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
5.8
Ratings
14% below category average
Service registry00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Service management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Service discovery00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Dependency management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Policy management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
Using SNS for any notification use case where available is the default and defacto solution. It directly integrates with SES to configure both incoming email and email delivery responses.
Additionally, any notifications, such as CloudWatch alarms, are a good use case for SNS topics and allow us to fan out delivery as needed (pagerduty, email, etc)
Read full review
It fits perfectly for SOA and EAI architecture with large numbers of services that required to be wired to each other, the binding virtualization is quite good to simply this part. For the simple scenario of orchestration and /or ESB architecture could be a better use traditional stack.
Read full review
Pros
  • Built in for quicker setup within AWS ecosystem.
  • Trusted as you control the users and configuration via IAM and easy access controls.
  • Can be sent to S3 simple storage or for long term storage if required.
  • Can be used in many regions, same configs.
Read full review
  • reduce the number of http port required by services
  • simplified the binding connection amongst services
  • high scalability and fast deployment of applications
Read full review
Cons
  • At times you receive access denied errors which are annoying.
  • Rarely do you receive internal failure errors where you can't access the information. It is rare but it does happen.
  • You are required to add an MWS Authentication Token every so often. I wish it would pull that information automatically for you so you don't have to go searching for it.
Read full review
  • health check of services and application features has been released with a lot of bugs that have never been fixed
  • it is not so simple to apply the security policy to service/reference binding
Read full review
Usability
It is useful for applications developed using event driven architecture. It helps in tracking and logging the events in a very timely and efficient manner. The dashboards are a little difficult to implement. But overall it is very easy to integrate with other AWS services like Lambda, API GW, S3 and DynamoDB. The permissions to access should be resolved before using it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The AWS documentation is well maintained and has lots of information which makes it easier for developers to refer to and develop applications in a fast efficient manner. It is well documented with examples which is easy to understand and implement. You can also get help by posting into forums from like-minded developers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) is well integrated in AWS and has been there since the early days of public cloud. It is a cost effective and very inexpensive solution to meet the needs of event notifications and custom messaging. Wish to share that there is considerable number of developers who can easily build solutions using AWS SNS. So, training costs are minimal. Other solutions are emerging and we are seeing a great usage especially of Firebase notifications because of its very neat integration with open source cross platform hybrid app frameworks like ionic, xamarin. SNS needs to become better and should have plugin support for the mobile application developers using low code/no code tools too.
Read full review
TIBCO service grid has been chosen as a natural selection of the TIBCO product evolution. The high flexibility and the binding virtualization fits very well with client needs for its EAI applications due to the huge number of services and applications, the management of application dependencies during deployment, the advantage of perfect integration with EMS for logging
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost of alert calls to the different stakeholders across different geographies have gone down since using Amazon SNS.
  • Amazon SNS has saved a lot of time for the employees that they used to spend to call multiple stakeholders so they can now focus more on productive tasks.
  • Amazon SNS usage needs prior knowledge of programming.
Read full review
  • The integration of old BW with BWSE and its interface quite similar to design time has reduced the cost of training for developers
  • The TIBCO support for this product is no the best and clients complains too much about this. This required to find a workaround or force the client to move to new/or different product. Huge impact on ROI
Read full review
ScreenShots