Amazon Elasticsearch Service vs. Apache Solr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that enables users to search, analyze, and visualize your log data at petabyte-scale. As a fully managed service, Amazon Elasticsearch Service manages the setup, deployment, configuration, patching, and monitoring of Elasticsearch clusters, so users can spend less time managing clusters and more time building applications. With a few clicks in the AWS console, users create scalable, secure, and available Elasticsearch clusters. Amazon…N/A
Apache Solr
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Apache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elasticsearch ServiceApache Solr
Likelihood to Recommend
Elasticsearch is a good alternative to relational databases for setting up complex searching of data. It's inbuilt features for slicing the data [in] different ways and its ability to add weights to search results makes it easy to set up complex searching scenarios. Given that data must be pushed to this service, it may be best suited for data that is not changing very rapidly.
Read full review
Very effective for end-user searching applications and for generating search results. Also very well suited to those looking for high reliability and performance. If [you're doing] fuzzy searching or if you are working on a smaller end-user application or an internal application that does not require high performance and flexible/adapting searching then it may not be necessary to use Solr.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fast Index based search.
  • Scalable.
  • Best for structured and unstructured data.
Read full review
  • Faceted navigation and field collapsing/grouping : filtering and quick results were what we needed for our websites. Our customers needed to have this functionalities for good and efficient results.
  • We tested them with our customers' registered searches (they received all new goods matching with their registered searches by emails and/or mobile push). Results were incredible by comparison with our old system (old MySQL requests).
  • Note : we didn't put all our data in Solr. Just what we need for searching uses. Other data stayed in our MySQL database.
  • Auto-suggest : our old auto-suggest wasn't performing well. With Apache Solr, our new one was worked really well ! The suggestions came quickly and suggestions were good.
  • We also extended auto-suggestion with geo-spatial data and it worked well.
  • Hit highlighting : we used this functionality and we didn't have problem and nasty surprise.
  • Keep all data status during data upgrading (see next details for improvements)
Read full review
Cons
  • Understanding how stale the data is and what data needs refreshed
Read full review
  • Ease of use -- this is not always the easier platform to configure.
  • Developer Community -- There are not a whole lot of folks out there that understand this stuff so finding talent is difficult.
  • Drupal 8 -- We've been frustrated with slow development on APIs for Drupal 8 integration.
Read full review
Usability
It is an extremely powerful tool if the time is put in to learn it. There are basic skeletons of out of the box behavior, it involves having really dedicated people to learn how to use it to take full advantage of its capabilities. A 10 for the tool itself, minus 3 for the difficulty in learning and maintenance
Read full review
It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Splunk is the most flexible of the 3 where you can manipulate the data to whatever fits your specific use case. Grafana has the most powerful capabilities but the steepest learning curve. Grafana also does offer the most flexibility as you can visualize almost any data source. Elastic is a solid middle ground between the 2
Read full review
We switched from search indexes stored in MySQL to soar and it's made a world of difference for our growing businesses. The relational databases are very poor for handling the complex data searches require and Solr delivered all the tools we need to get the performance our end users are demanding.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The cost is a bit expensive if compared with other clouds but [the] performance is very good.
Read full review
  • It's enabled us to deliver fast, relevant search results on our new website. The site is still in beta and being actively developed so our complete ROI is still unknown.
  • It integrates very well with Drupal so it has saved us from having to develop a custom solution.
Read full review
ScreenShots