Amazon Elastic Transcoder vs. SAP on IBM Cloud

If your entire stack is in AWS. Amazon Elastic Transcoder is easier to integrate into your workflow. As input and output files can be in S3. You can get notifications when your job is complete. If you want real-time transcoding it is not possible with this service.

Incentivized

There are some specific scenarios where SAP on IBM Cloud is less appropriate. For example, if a company is looking for a platform to run small or experimental applications, then SAP on IBM Cloud may not be the best option. Additionally, if a company is looking for a very customized or tailored solution, then SAP on IBM Cloud may also be less appropriate. However, for most businesses who are looking for a secure, scalable, and reliable platform to run their business applications, SAP on IBM Cloud is an excellent option.

Incentivized

• converting and playing audio and video files on the go
• cloud capability
• speed and reliability

Incentivized

• Reaching multiple business data across various platforms
• Analytics are the best and effective
• Intelligent capabilities and reporting tools are excellent
• Easy to manage project

Incentivized

• Cannot transcode videos in real time
• The quality of transcoded videos is average. There are other services that provide better quality output.
• Slow AWS support

Incentivized

• Migrating SAP workloads to Cloud is not easy especially to new users.
• Data recovery if made easy it will be superb.
• It is complex to maintain Clouds data security by new users.

Incentivized

Support for Amazon Elastic Transcoder is the same as any other service within AWS. If you are familiar with AWS, it is easy to start using Elastic Transcoder

Incentivized

It takes time to respond and never gives good solutions to the problems, since it seems somewhat robotic with its automatic messages, then when we speak directly with the support, it never gives a solution to our problems, we have to find other ways.

Incentivized

Amazon Elastic Transcoder is in a league of its own when compared to other alternatives in the market. The most noticeable competitor would be either Microsoft or Adobe or Google. When I had a chance to compare Azure products and Amazon products, the difference is obvious and the experience provided by both the products are very different in terms of user experience and interaction with the application. The cost and availability also were taken into consideration when choosing between the two shortlisted choices. So we went with Amazon's product as it is widely used and has support and maintenance which is basically better than the competition.

Incentivized

I have tested out both Microsoft Azure and SAP on IBM Cloud and can confidently say that SAP on IBM Cloud is the obvious choice. The key advantages of SAP on IBM Cloud compared to Microsoft Azure are that IBM Cloud offers free unlimited access to tech support, provides higher object storage space as well as unlimited private virtual servers.

Incentivized

• Amazon Elastic Transcoder is faster and costs less than most competitors

Incentivized

• We used the tool to generate great data insights.
• Integration with multiple data sources.
• Powerful data access and data visualization.
• Reporting capabilities can not be compared.

Incentivized