TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon EKS

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.

    $0.10

    per month

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Pricing
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Editions & Modules
    Amazon EKS Cluster
    $.10
    per hour of each cluster created
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda is much easier to use than the near alternatives. It is so straightforward and lightweight it is my primary service for handling small transactions or triggers. The other services require more setup time and are more complex to use. AWS Lambda takes your code snippet …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    Features
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    8.9
    1 Ratings
    14% above category average
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    9.3
    3 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings6.52 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.3
    (48 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (13 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon EKSAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
    • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
    • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
    • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
    • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Good performance of platform without hiccups
    • Less number of people required to manage cluster
    • Easier to deploy new microservices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots